UK Politics
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
view the rest of the comments
It is huge. But so is the company so % is the only datathat matters.
On a store by store comparison. The average turn over of a local corner shop. Would not be able to support a family on 5% profit margins. They tend to function on 10 to 15%. And that is low compared to other industries.
As I pointed out. The issue is more. Tescos is so huge. 5%. Allows it to destroy all but other huge competition. So it prevents competition from ever getting a foot hold.
As all large corperation s will do when given the opportunity.
This 100%. Lot of brain dead takes here with "3 billion is a big number!"
Nods. It is also why the media uses such numbers.
It is intentionally trying to make a news article out of the profit rather then the size of the corperation.
The media's owners etc. Do not want voters spending to much time worrying about how large corperation s are able to overpower all competitive attempts from new businesses. It goes against all the advantages they sell about capitalism. And may encourage voters to call for the breakup of such corps.
The real answer is to tax the rich. Taxing groceries more? Just more taxes on the poors.
Agreed. But let's ensure we get the wording correct.
Tax wealth income equally.
Because just saying tax the rich. Allows the rich to claim we want to increase higher income taxes. Leaving the left arguing with people who should be on our side.
They do this intentionally to divert the argument from real wealth. Because they know their arguments against taxing wealth fall down when openly challenged. So using higher income earners to distract the argument. Saves them defending their real income source.