this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
166 points (100.0% liked)
History Memes
1082 readers
1184 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism (including tankies/red fash), atrocity denial or apologia, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Piefed.social rules.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
OTHER COMMS IN THE HISTORYVERSE:
- !historymusic@quokk.au
- !historygallery@quokk.au
- !historymemes@piefed.social
- !historyruins@piefed.social
- !historyart@piefed.social
- !historyartifacts@piefed.social
- !historyphotos@piefed.social
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's indeed likely, but do you have any hard evidence?
I consider this comment hard evidence:
https://vger.to/sh.itjust.works/comment/22058396
This account is an LLM being fed the post title.
The static two or three paragraph structure was a red flag, but this is actually good. I've reported it and recommend others to do the same.
Good thing someone was there to think for you!
Whatever do you do when youβre on your own?
Bait maniacs for fun.
Ah, is that what you call it when you interact with other people? Tell yourself itβs all part of a plan?
Fail to use your own brain, rely on others to do it for you, then claim to yourself youβre intentionally clever?
Roflmao.
π£
Itβs actually able to review the content of static images too.
Yeah, I do. Are you the botβs owner, looking to fix your mistakes?
You are very defensive. I'm just trying to gather evidence so I can report it. Go bark up some other tree.
What the hell would I be defensive about? Look for yourself. And who cares if you report it, it will simply disappear and start over as new accounts.
I was only pointing it out, not signing up to think for you.
You tell me, why are you so on edge? Who hurt you?
Hahaha
See this discussion is what I would consider passing a Turing test. They aren't even close to replicating your behavior.
Absent any evidence, you just look like a stalker.
Roflmao. Yup. Iβm stalking a 15 hour old account.
This species is fucked.
Edit-
Hahahahahhaha, I just checked and your previous comment was:
Are you in the same network of bot owners?
OK so the evidence is that they posted a lot in 15 hours? Why not just say that?
Edit: a bunch of unrelated comments is not a Turing test, and you're agreeing that they fail.
"I'm not a stalker!" - you
No. There is more. Use your own brain, turing test expert.
Perhaps I should. π
Iβm laughing so hard the person who said that cannot see one, even when itβs pointed out to them.
That same person also thinks looking at comment history to validate a bot is a bot isβ¦ βstalkingβ.
As I said. Our species is well and truly fucked.
I'm not denying that they're bots either, I just haven't administered a Turing test to them and you're weirdly refusing to back up your assertions. Do you think I'm a bot too?
No, I think youβre either gaslighting or incredibly stupid. I donβt need to back anything up when all you have to do is look and use your brain. I pointed out the bot.
Not my job to think for you.
I'm lazy. I expect you to back up your own claims and am not going to "do my own research" looking for who knows what.