this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
1800 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17459 readers
2791 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I genuinely think that in some third world countries, as part of the middle class, you can have a better life than in the USA.

[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something I've noticed is when untraveled people in the USA try to contextualize themselves with other countries they pick the worst examples they can think of. Favelas in Brazil or slums in South Africa for example. We do this to the point where our entire conception of countries (or in the case of Africa, continents) is the worst imagery we can think of. I think they genuinely don't believe that, for all their troubles India, Brazil, Mexico, Nigeria, etc also have smartphones and big buildings and libraries and universities and laboratories, and educated people living decent lives.

They also can't see how the overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia, the rundown schools full of illiterate kids, the impunity of rich private interests, the corrupt sheriffs and judges, and on and on, puts us in the company of the "third world countries". Yes we have nice places too, but SO DO THEY. A broken society in the 21st century isn't people living in mud huts, it's children shitting in the street next to a glass skyscraper with LEED Platinum certification.

[–] SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

And it's not just "overcrowded jails full of pretrial prisoners, the barefoot children carrying buckets for water in Appalachia" but the grad students in LA living out of their cars, or grandpa sleeping on a bus stop, or people in the Rockies surviving off roadkill and forage.

Seattle tent cities/tiny homes make some Favelas look real swanky.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Logically, it's not about how much money you make, it's about purchasing power. It is irrelevant if you earn only $400 a month when you can eat well for $1 and pay $100 for your housing, you have free health care and education. That is the reality in some third world countries.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Third world doesn't mean poor, it just means not aligned with US or Russia

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

It used to mean that. First World was US aligned (or at least US friendly), Second World was Soviet aligned, Third World was not aligned

Now though, First World means developed nations, Third World means poor nations, Second World has fallen out of use

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Espousing an old no longer relevant definition to sound smarter and be "right" is peak lemmy/reddit behavior. Third world does mean poor now.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It does. Strictly it does. Why do you think china is no longer considered third world?

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Strictly, technically every other way China is still third world. This concept of third world being poor seems to have originated from the common charity ads in the 90s and 2000s who loved the phrase, and from the American exceptionalism that thinks everything not American is dirty and poor.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Being poor is the only way a country is third world or not. Being politically related to America is not relevant to the present definition. So no, it is not "technically in every other way". It just is not a third world country, period.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wrong. That's not what it means, no matter what anyone says on here.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you seriously think you know what a word's meaning is better than the hundreds of millions of people who use it in a way different from how you suggest it?

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I know it's meaning just fine.

[–] ManOMorphos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No one really uses that word in its Cold War context anymore. It's the common term for "developing countries" and the like.

[–] Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People believe that only because they haven't learned what it actually means.

[–] ManOMorphos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You're right that they either never learned what 1st-2nd-3rd world really means, or they forgot what they were taught in history class. Unfortunately it still is the main term to refer to poor countries even though it's incorrect. Language seems to be biased towards the common meaning over the technically correct meaning.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Spain isn't third world, it already had shown the middle finger to Trump and also has few to do with Rusia. Third world countries don't certainly mean people starving, the people there often have all what they need, but this, you'll see few Ferraries there and chalets with swimming pool. Someone is rich, not necesarly because a lot of money, but because he need only few. We often enter in a rabbit hole of the consumism, spending a lot of money in things we really don't need, we work like a dog to have enough money to pay a journey to Hawaii to recover us from the burnout, which we wouldn't have working less, no needing this journey.

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Have you been to Spain? I'm not saying it is not better than where the US is headed to, but it's a "western" country in Europe, with all the issues that come with it. Somewhat social market economy, but still suffering from the usual issues, including people driving Ferraris while others sleep on the street.

Also, at least since Franco I don't think anyone genuinely thinks of Spain as third world.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Well, I'm from Spain, also in Spain there are People with Ferraries (few) and also poor people, but there is nobody without food, because Spain has a strong social system and free healthcare for everyone. Nothing, absolute nothing to do with the US, it's the opposite in almost everything. Luckily Spain has also little dependency on the US or Rusia, so it is also not much affected by Trumps Tariffs or Rusian Gaspolicy. Trump hates Spain.

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a reason countries like Vietnam are so popular with digital nomads.

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My dream would be to get a remote nightshift job and live in a house by the beaches of south Thailand

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's also much harder to become a middle class in those countries.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Not really. Poverty rates are higher, yes, but many middle income third world countries do have sizeable and growing middle classes. They're called developing countries for a reason. The image of war-torn African countries where everyone works in mines isn't really representative.