this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
384 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

12775 readers
809 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] commander@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Topaz is absolutely the best. There are other commercial software out there that's talked up a bit but everything i've read says Topaz is still better. Free stuff, nothing really comes close. There's this that i hope get's better and more developer interest. Available on Linux and Windows

https://github.com/TNTwise/REAL-Video-Enhancer

If you're Windows only, there's this. It's more mature in development

https://github.com/AaronFeng753/Waifu2x-Extension-GUI

But Topaz is better than everything else. It's why I grabbed a used laptop with an Nvidia GPU for a good price

The free stuff is real hit or miss with real life video. Animations generally always looks good

[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What models do you recommend usually for AMD cards?

[–] commander@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I buy XFX. I think Sapphire is really well regarded. I feel like I had a Sapphire ATI card a long time ago. Pretty sure XFX and Sapphire are the major time tested brands. You can probably be good buying the cheapest brand though

[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh. I like doing a round 4x in Iris and then converting it down and doing a 4x in Proteus. A lot of times Iris is enough. The newer starlight mini everyone says is way better especially with not making terrifying faces when there's not enough data but I'm not subscribing again for that

[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is Iris much faster than you, also how do you convert it?

[–] commander@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Iris does seem faster to me compared to Proteus. Didn't see much use for me from like Gaia compared to Proteus. I convert down resolution with Handbrake with a pretty high quality target for h264 and then run it again in topaz with Proteus. 4x with Iris, than resolution back down by 4 and then 4x back up with Proteus. I feel like Iris + Proteus gives a real good result for low resolution content

[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you have the full settings with Iris and Handbrake for me in a screenshot, thank you. I wanna upload some content when I'll return to Reddit.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Iris I always use medium video quality source. Anything that needs low usually looks terrible on the upscale

[–] IonTempted@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you, may I ask why you downscale and then upscale again rather than just take what Iris gives you

[–] commander@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Iris is really good with faces. That's it's design. The reason is going from a high res up 4x takes too long and downscaling fuzzes up the picture a bit so things don't get too smoothed out when you upscale a 2nd time. Also there's a resolution limit on the upscale so can't get too large