this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
218 points (98.7% liked)

Privacy

46368 readers
779 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Many of us know how bad modern cars are for privacy. Yet many of our friends and neighbors do not realize how intrusive it really is. I linked a blog entry from Mozilla's investigation about car privacy. In that blog is a link to their make-by-make analysis. The amount of very intimate information a modern car collects is honestly appalling. It includes health data, real time mood information, weight gain or loss, and so on. And it does so even for passengers.

The web has many resources talking about this problem, but almost no resources on what to do about it. I know the simple thing is to say, "just drive an old car bro!" That's fine if you can, but not everyone can. Also it has drawbacks like more maintenance. Sometimes less safety if it's older than certain safety features. For the purpose of this thread, it is more interesting to focus on newer, surveillance enabled cars which are the majority of what people drive on the road today.

Some people have figured out how to bypass the surveillance package on some cars. One way is to uncouple the antenna it uses to phone home. Other times you can bypass the telematics module or remove a fuse that powers it. I feel like we really need a central model by model repository of information.

Past that, how do we prove it has worked, if we do it? Has anyone reading this tried to use an RF detector to see if their car is still trying to phone home, after they have bypassed telematics? What are your experiences? I want to buy one and use it to test my own car, but the info on the web seems sketch.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deacon@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

When I had to reluctantly buy a used car, I made it a point to buy a used car no newer than 2015 and this is why. Well this and touchscreen mania.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think touch screens are going away, sadly.

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Which is why I will never buy a car made after 2015 if I can possibly avoid it. If I were writing the rules,

  • My car should not be capable of pay-walling any features

  • Just like my phone, I should have fine grained control over what data my car shares and with whom

  • No vehicle controls that may need to be accessed while driving should require more than one click on a touchscreen to access

  • Any touchscreen UI should be easily controllable from a steering wheel type d-pad

  • No non-entertainment vehicle controls should be primarily accessible from a touchscreen

  • Any controls that affect the speed, position, size, or access of the car should only have secondary touchscreen controls that are upstream of any failures modes in the primary physical control; in other words, a UI control should only be a backup method for important functions of the vehicle, and they shouldn't be able to break the main method if they break