Ahh yes, the imaginary orbital protection pulled straight from Reagan's playbook.
post
So we're just breaking treaties without concern now? Treaties we WROTE?
Welcome to the US where everything’s made up and treaties don’t matter.

Although it forbids establishing military bases, testing weapons and conducting military maneuvers on celestial bodies, the treaty does not expressly ban all military activities in space, nor the establishment of military space forces or the placement of conventional weapons in space.
Well, I guess I never bothered to learn about it more than a general "don't weaponize space" sentiment. It expressly forbids weapons of mass destruction in space, but I guess less powerful weapons are fine.
Nah, were lying.
its called satellite debris, orbital bombardment. its also a thing in RA3.
U can used starlink to form a distributed synthetic radar dish, so u can probably use it too to jam things, electronic weapons do count too
What Kind?
Platforms like the X37b, don't listen to the golden dome bullshit or fantasizing about lugging tungsten rods all the way up into space to drop back down as weapons, but recognize that what you can do with an unmanned spaceplane that can move unpredictably between orbits without wasting a ton of fuel is basically undermine the entire global communications infrastructure in ways nobody can really guard against or necessarily even detect.
Okay whats it equipped with?
A robotic arm, electronics warfare, signals intelligence equipment and high powered sensors, what else do you want or need?
So
Pretty sure every modern nation has some of those flying about, pretty basic shit for sattelite equipment.
Anything which qualifies as a weapon by most definitions?
No, virtually no other nation possesses this, China likely does to a certain extent and that is probably it.
We are talking about an evolution of the space shuttle program, this is not something anybody possesses that cannot build a space shuttle type vehicle.
You claim no other nation has a spaceplane sattelite with
-
Telecommunications equipment
-
Robotic arms
?
A spaceplane not a satellite fool, they are radically different things.
Technically anything capable of achieving orbit is a satellite, but a sub-orbital spaceplane would be drastically less effective at the listed objectives.
It isn't suborbital, it uses highly eccentric orbits to aerobrake and shift to different ones, not what you are saying at all.
So we agree it's a satellite.
Not in the common meaning of a manmade satellite, the chief difference being a normal satellite is highly limited in capability of changing and maintaining its orbit with a tiny reserve of fuel compared to a spaceplane that can also use its aerodynamics when it hits the atmosphere to redirect momentum and change orbits without firing thrusters hard.
The X-37b is a reusable spacecraft which also makes it entirely different than a normal satellite.
Are you just trolling me or can you really not understand the difference?
If you are trolling me realize you aren't making yourself look very intelligent in the process.
Nothing new under the sun. It was one of the reasons for the space shuttle program and it is rumoured a few secret launches visited soviet satellites.
The OG plan for the Hubble telescope was to bring it back with the space shuttle.
Why is anyone surprised theres now drones in orbit with similar capabilties.
They arent CnC Generals zero hour orbital cannons
Isn't the guard to be able to identify and intercept this platform? Sounds challenging at this scale, but so was air missile/drone interception, and it was achieved. I bet the USA and China are already working on this or even already achieved it.
Nope, hitting an object in a predictable orbit is easy, this is a dynamic spaceplane capable of adjusting its trajectory arbitrarily.
Iran has missiles that do that, so it's not a stretch to think Russia, China, Israel have them too, and tbh maybe Iran.
To hit predictable orbit satellites with very narrow capacities to adjust their orbit...
Of course, how could I forget? No one comes close to American exceptionalism.
In this case I think it's the exceptionally large amount of money that the US spends on "defense".
Trillions of dollars spent and decades of it is incomparable to any other nation.
Where is your nation's space shuttle program again? What space shuttles have your country produced and used over decades that would give them the practical experience necessary to build a spacecraft like the x-37b?
Yes, this is an exceptional capability of the US.....
Aren't modern missiles and drones also able to adjust?

all 48 comments