Shocker, people who move heaven and earth in their personal lives to achieve a socially difficult thing are pretty sure about wanting that.
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
124 points (97.7% liked)
LGBTQ+
6776 readers
163 users here now
All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.
See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC
Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Taken together, 82% of those who went back to living as their sex assigned at birth at least for a little while did so because of social and structural factors that made it difficult to be trans in their community.
That could include folks who continued medical transition but chose to boymode or girlmode over a summer holiday or until finding a more inclusive work environment.
That’s often how transphobes define detransition, because they have to juke every stat they can. (Not saying that’s why the authors are doing it, but they are probably having to navigate a scene filled with data based on that) When bigots say X% detransition, they don’t mention the *re-*transition that many go through, or that many detransitioners don’t “return” to their birth sex identity because they never had a binary gender identity to begin with.
By their definition I’ve detransitioned before when I was off hormones and not making an effort at presenting as male, but it was 100% situational and I knew it was a temporary thing while it was happening.
Transphobes intentionally muddy the water by letting people assume that the colloquial definition most people use—deciding you aren’t transgender and that you want to return to your birth sex—is the same one they’re using. But it’s absolutely not.
In our next news section: Water makes things wet.
Seriously though, thanks for sharing. It's good to have evidence backing up what we all knew.
~~Trump will read the report~~ Someone will summarize the report for Trump, and his response will be “great! The hate and intolerance is working! Keep those anti-trans bills coming! Let’s make them as uncomfortable as possible!”
Okay... there's not really any serious question that de-transition is often a result of transphobia, and that the vast majority of those who explore the gender squiggles at some point in their lives do not detransition. But this survey and this article are making an argument using awful, bullshit science and should be called out for it.
This is a survey done on trans people. This does not include those who did explore transition and then came to the conclusion they were cis. There is no valid means for these authors to draw any conclusions about the claim they are making. And, those who are anti-trans could easily take a bad-faith reading of this which is "9% of people who transition questioned their decision before remaining under the trans ideology, which confirms that this is something our children are being pressured into."
We need people to stop doing fake pseudo-science bullshit analysis and calling it trans science.
Reading the article, I'm not entirely sure the survey authors are claiming that. The quote they pulled sounds like it just says among the people surveyed (who are known to be trans), those stats apply. They're definitely very easy to misuse though. I feel like it would be nice to actually have good stats for people who detransition, but it seems almost impossible without someone trying to bias the results at this point.
Only 4% of people who went back to living in their sex assigned at birth for a while cited that their reason was because they realized that gender transition was not for them. When considering all respondents who had transitioned, this number equates to only 0.36%.
I will grant you that the survey includes the information in a much better context compared to the article. However, this paragraph from the survey I take issue with. Those who de-transition are the only subcategory that is compared to the total population in the written text in this way, even if the percentages are subsequently present in a chart.
Taken together, 82% of those who went back to living as their sex assigned at birth at least for a little while
The conclusion on the following page also clearly identifies that de-transition on the basis of identity is uncommon. It also uses "at least for a little while" as though it's a portion of a larger demographic, which it is not. Perhaps they mean it as compared to those who are currently not living as the gender they identify with, but I think that's a strained interpretation.
I think it's disingenuous to attempt to make a claim about the occurrence rate of something which can't be captured in your survey without noting the incompleteness. Especially so given the controversial nature of detransition within the broader conversation about trans issues. While it is technically true that the claim is made only of survey respondents, I still feel that the way the section is drafted provides/implies a broader framing.
My opinions here are clearly quite pedantic. However, the topic is one where it's critical that care be taken to avoid giving opponents any reason to discredit the larger work.
There is never going to be a Perfect Study that eliminates transphobia, and if nitpicking is what is keeping someone from supporting trans rights, I don’t think they were ever going to be much of a supporter to begin with.
If 10% of people detransitioned because they no longer consider themselves trans it wouldn’t matter, because expressing your gender identity is a basic right everyone has as a human being, regardless of what regrets other people have about their own choices. Nobody is ever going to be able to guarantee you’re not going to wind up regretting any given action you take, that’s just life.