this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
104 points (97.3% liked)

politics

26239 readers
2831 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During the first Trump administration there was often the feeling of being unable to escape the news. Every day, a new presidential proclamation via Twitter. Every day, a comment made in a press gaggle with potentially staggering implications. For many, the impact was immediate; but more often than not, the threat remained conceptual. This time around is different; things are actually getting materially worse each day, and the human brain is unequipped to notice, let alone process, all of it.

From the continued genocide in Gaza and the disappearing of immigrants off our streets by federal agents, to the dismantling of our health care infrastructure and the ever-growing scourge of gun violence, the pace of news is relentless. Even so, it’s crucial to take stock of events that each on their own would have once been considered a catastrophe, especially when much of major American media would give you the impression that the only thing that happened over the weekend was Charlie Kirk’s hagiographic memorial.

Let’s walk through a few important stories you may have missed—

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you needed any more proof Stephen Miller is a white supremacist psychopath:

The day after the first strike, Miles Taylor, a former chief of staff for the Department of Homeland Security during the first Trump presidency, shared a telling exchange. In his newsletter, Taylor said the exchange took place after Trump visited a counter-drug command center in Florida.

On the flight home, Stephen Miller — then a senior advisor to the president — sat down across from me and the head of the U.S. Coast Guard. What followed was a conversation I’ll never forget.

“Admiral,” Miller asked, “the military has aerial drones, correct?”

“Yes,” the Admiral answered.

“And some of those drones are equipped with missiles, correct?”

“Sure,” the Admiral said, beginning to catch on.

Miller pressed further: “And when a boat full of migrants is in international waters, they aren’t protected by the U.S. Constitution, right?”

The Admiral clarified that while technically true, international law still applied.

“Then tell me why,” Miller said, “can’t we use a Predator drone to obliterate that boat?”

The Admiral, a veteran of military command, was dumbfounded. “Because it would be against international law,” he replied. You can’t kill unarmed civilians just because you want to.

Stephen Miller didn’t appear interested in the legal implications. Indeed, he seemed more interested in whether anyone could stop Trump from committing such acts.

“Admiral,” he concluded, “I don’t think you understand the limitations of international law.”

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't illegal immigrants to the US come overland through Mexico anyway? Am I making things up?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most undocumented immigrants in the US came legally overland or via plane from Canada or Europe and then overstayed their visas.

The focus isn't on the US-Mexico border (which is already the most heavily guarded border between two countries that aren't at war with each other in the world) because of any real problem. It's purely for xenophobic propaganda reasons.

But yes, the vast majority of refugees and other immigrants from South and Central America come to the US by land or air rather than by sea.

[–] apenstaartje@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

Canadians can be here illegally. Chinese. Australians. But yes, the southern border is a popular place for such activities.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Speaking of shit, who designed this mess?

Thank FSM for reader mode!

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It didn't render like that all for me with Firefox mobile. It still wasn't fantastic, but nowhere near that bad.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's weird.. Maybe it specifically hates Nightly? 🤷

[–] iglou@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

Looks like you just had a loading issue. It seems that some CSS loaded, while some did not. Or maybe none did, and the little styling you see was inline styling.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

I mean some shit I don't even worry about. Theres me and my family and our personal situation, then my local area, then the larger local area, then the state, then the country and at the country level everything is so bad now that everything else gets dumped at this point. I had more concern before but the best thing I can do for the international community is get my own country normalized and prevent it from being a threat to everyone else.