Rose

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the mere fact of someone having (presumably) taken the great risks of entering the US illegally and staying illegally is enough to infer that going back is not seen as a viable option, hence me discussing the alternatives as requested. On the other hand, suggesting to go back to Mexico is as good as no advice, because that's what deportation does as well.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

It's best to ask those who risk everything just to get to the US. I assume Mexico is inferior by most if not all metrics, at least pre-Trump. For example, you are five times more likely to be murdered in Mexico than in the US.

Edit: killed->murdered

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (8 children)

You're not wrong, but if the person is from Mexico, where else do they go? If they don't have many items and can afford a flight to another continent, they could try taking one to a country like Russia, then illegally cross into Europe, but that's another risk.

1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Rose@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@beehaw.org
 

The survival game with co-op support was previously known as Svalbard.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

That logic makes absolutely no sense. Look into Google before you take issue with Mozilla.