jmill

joined 5 days ago
[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you made money doing that, it probably would be illegal. You would certainly get sued, in any case.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

USA had the same thing, "Cash for Clunkers". Some of the cars we were better off getting rid of. Some of them not, whether because they were rare or classic, or old but still more fuel efficient than a truck or SUV. Sure increased the average price of a used car though.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Of course. But I'm not a machine churning out an endless spew of those bits and pieces with no further creative input. I'd be on the side of giving any truly conscious entity rights (including creative ones), but LLMs are not, and I don't think ever could be, conscious. That's just not how they work, to my understanding anyway.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Of course. Those resources are just a much larger impact percentage wise on an appliance replaced every two years vs 25.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

But you can't make copies of it and sell them.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 days ago (16 children)

In this analogy, the AI uses books like a remix DJ would use bits and pieces of songs from different tracks to splice together their output. Except in the case of AI, it will be much harder to identify the original source.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 47 points 2 days ago (7 children)

More water and energy efficient to run, yes. If you have to replace them every couple of years the resources used to make new ones need to be included too though, and that will have a big impact on the comparison. That said, I have had a modern front load pair for at least 5 years now, no issues.