15 for a phone number, so only twice as bad.
And then not, as Iban has a checksum so you'll directly see errors, as opposed to a phone which will just reach the wrong person
15 for a phone number, so only twice as bad.
And then not, as Iban has a checksum so you'll directly see errors, as opposed to a phone which will just reach the wrong person
Nice to meet you gay, I'm moved
You mean inconvenient. At this point, it's a lot less hassle just to use sepa instant.
I want to send you money.
"Hey, does your bank support wero? Great. I need your phone number. No, my bank doesn't support sending to emails. OK, I saved it to my contacts, I can now open my bank app and send you your 5€."
vs
"5€? Sure. opens banking app what's your iban? OK, done"
Expenses. Have none when you can't pay
You're saving a lot of money that way
There even is an official wero app, but you cannot use it when your bank offers wero in theirs.
In my opinion the whole thing with wero being tied to your checking account is stupid. Most people have one. And dont want to give out the account data to their primary salary to everyone.
I have four accounts that support wero. For each, its baked into the banking app. Each is totally different. While one can even generate qr codes for payment, the other only supports phone numbers from my address book, cant even input a number.
Oh, and it leaks my Iban if I actually pay with it.
Hopefully its not such a shit show like wero is now
Thought heise already won in lower courts. Tbh I dont care too much, I trust ublock way more than any reject button anyways
No, yes, probably, that's absurd
In Germany its legal to demand payment for reject all, that's what you're seeing at heise 🤡
Germany. There are older numbers that are only 14 digits, bit that's about it, for mobile.
And to be fair, wero doesn't really exist :D