Please refrain from Ad Hominem attacks.
Strawman.
No one said this, ever!
I can tell you don't read that much!
You didn't read the link you posted (typical). It says 24% don't prefer to continue fighting until victory and most prefer a negotiated settlement.
Progressive is an adjective in this context. Your characterization is misleading and incorrect.
OP clearly supports Putin's Russia as a perceived bullwark against NATO.
I didn't catch your apology for the ad hominem. Kindly reply herewith
As you acknowledge, it quite clearly states Putin's Russia plays a "progressive role."
I'd like you to apologize to me for calling me "drunk." It was ad hominem and has no place in discourse.
Russia invaded Ukraine. Russia bombed children's hospitals and bankrolled Trump Jr's wedding. If you and I are against imperialism, we should be against all of these things.
Could we please not resort to ad hominem attacks and insults, "Nonconfrontational"? This isn't Reddit.
Logically, I don't follow where that was specifically asked, but here's a comment calling Putin's Russia progressive: https://lemmy.ml/comment/27815508
Criticism of the US prison system is warranted but we must ensure that it is accurate, no?
It's strange to me that you think I'm flexing. Aren't we essentially arguing the same thing: that all humans have the right to live in decency?
Probation is distinct from parole in the US legal system. Shall I provide you with a source to clarify the difference?
Criticism of the USSR, Stalin, and Putin is deleted in ml instances. My deletion history proves it.
The representation was inaccurate, as 80% of the 1996 US figure quoted were on probation, not incarcerated.
It's not lazy ragebaiting to verify facts, is it?
And since you're such an expert, which Lemmy user in particular, was insulted? Why is the mere assertion that one works on behalf of an intelligence service considered an insult by a disinterested observer?
So we're in agreement that one should not be banned for expressing a negative opinion of the USSR?