Poland

58 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
tfm
1
 
 

For me is clear that russia is afraid of Rzeczypospolita restoration because this union will destroy Moscow regime. Accusing Ukraine and Ukrainian in Volyn tragedy, in honoring Bandera and Shukhevych are not acceptable. We believe it is antiukrainian and prorussian rythoric. Explain you why. Regarding Bandera and Shukhevych - they were fighting for independence for Ukraine like we do now. And they were fighting with Moscow - it is the one and only our enemy from ancient times. So critisizm that we honor the memory of this people is not acceptable. In the same time we are rejecting nazism - we believe that all people are equal and have right to confess any religion. Unlike in Poland. Regarding Volyn tragedy - we know that seim recognized Volyn tragedy as genocide made by Ukrainians against Polish people. It is absolutely biased decision. First of all Ukraine in 1943 was not independent to accept such solutions. Second it was a war and we were fighting on 2 fronts - with German nazi and soviet nazi. So your media, politicians and church want to present Ukraine in a bad light and blame it for the crimes committed by the Moscow regime. It is unacceptable. Another example how russia want to destroy relations between Ukraine and Poland - occurred when Polish politicians (and FSB agents at the same time) such as Slawomir Metzen closed the border and scattered Ukrainian grain. Knowing what effect this would have on Ukraine, which lost from 5 to 30 million people during the Holodomor of 1932-1933…

2
6
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by bonnashejve to c/Poland
 
 

Poland has elected a new president who has studied history and he should know what geopolitics is like no other. But instead he is stepping on the same rake that his predecessors did. From the outside, this looks either like blatant Russian influence or like elementary ignorance of its history. What am I talking about? In Ukraine, a full-scale war has been going on since 2022, where we are fighting for survival. At the same time, Poland has accepted millions of Ukrainians and provided them with all possible assistance... and although ordinary Poles sympathize with Ukrainians, their most prominent politicians, including Navrosky, quickly reversed course.

Ukraine and Ukrainians began to be accused of all mortal sins, they were also reminded of the events in Volhynia during the war (note that during the war, when Ukraine did not have independence!), the attitude towards Ukrainians deteriorated, children in schools began to be discriminated against by their own peers from Poland. Very often you can hear the contemptuous "Wypierdolaj!" (Get out!) from the Poles. This is all thanks to Polish politicians, the Catholic Church and the Russian media. And now Poland has elected a new president who built his political campaign solely on how bad Ukrainians are.

Of course, this has cooled relations between the countries. But the Poles still have not understood that they are cutting the branch they are sitting on. I will try to clarify. Critics of Ukraine is a big mistake of the Polish government and Putin will certainly take advantage of this. Russia's task is to quarrel Poland with Ukraine ... and they are successfully doing it, we see that Navrotsky received more than 50% of the votes, that is, the Poles are easy to manipulate... Now the media is actively discussing peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, which are aimed at masking a full-scale Russian invasion of Poland and lulling the vigilance of the Poles. Polish media often publish headlines that Russia will NOT attack Poland, and that thanks to NATO and the USA, Poland is protected. But is this really true?

Can Russia be trusted and is it really afraid of NATO? In fact, RUSSIA is not afraid of anyone or anything. But now all the cards are in hands - Trump is in power, which means the following. In case a Russian attack on Poland, neither the EU, nor the USA, nor Great Britain will defend Poland. Poland will be left alone with Russia. Mr. Nawrotsky, as a historian, should know this better than anyone. How many times have allied countries promised Poland protection and how many times have they betrayed it?...Countless.... Putin is illogical, irrational, and stubborn. He's short on time and short on money right now. And he likes to play big, so he's going to raise the stakes. And yet, Nawrotsky naively hopes that the USA will save Poland... We must understand that Trump is a supporter of great empires. He himself likes the idea of ​​capturing Canada, Greenland, Latin America... Therefore, he does not mind Russia getting the Poland if Russia helps him in the war against Muslims... This is what was discussed at the meetings of the presidents. What does this mean for Poland?

The USA will withdraw from NATO, Great Britain and the EU countries will refuse to fight against Russia, and all the dreams that the Poles built will crumble in one day.What will Mr. Navrotsky say about Ukraine then and how will he look in the eyes of Ukrainians whom he has been slandering for so long? You should understand, Putin is using anti-Ukrainian rhetoric in Poland to set Ukraine against the Poles and in case of an attack, Ukraine will stand aside. Doesn't it seem strange that Poland is hoping for help from a distant country across the ocean (which has stopped supplying weapons to Ukraine) and at the same time neglects and despises its closest neighbor who has been fighting against Russia for three years? Poles, analyze the situation a little. Because right now it is far from your favor... Here is a lesson in geopolitics for Mr. Navrotsky and all those who criticize Ukraine without understanding the simple things. Poles, Ukraine is not your friend, it is ONE AND ONLY friend in the war against russia.

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/post/810980

Nawrocki, aka the "nationalist" candidate, just won the election in Poland with a very narrow margin. > > Nawrocki is formally independent, but is aligned with the PiS party of current president Duda, who were responsible for undermining Polish democracy by among other things stacking the courts with illegitimate judges. As the president has the power to block all judidcal appointments, it does not look like Poland will have their democracy back for the next five years: Duda has simply blocked all judicial appointments rendering the Polish state a lame duck, and in all likelihood Nawrocki will keep up the same obstructionist strategy. > > Then again, that's what they voted for.

4
3
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by bonnashejve to c/Poland
 
 

Poles through the eyes of a Ukrainian woman. After the presidential elections in Poland, Ukraine may get the impression that it has been betrayed. Since Mr. Nawrocki came to power - with purely anti-Ukrainian rhetoric. What is the problem of the Poles? In their Nazism. No matter how strange it may sound. Because very often you can hear accusations from Poles that we honor Stepan Bandera. But honoring the memory of a person and purely Nazi behavior are different things. What surprised me most in Poland and on their dating sites, social networks (in particular Sympatia.pl, mastodon.com.pl ) - any information that contradicts what is officially recognized by the Catholic Church is immediately deleted, this is exactly what moderators exist for - to hide the truth from people. Profiles are either blocked or hidden... And this is the first sign of Nazism. People are not told the truth. The second - the Catholic Church promotes the superiority of the Polish people over others - in particular over Ukrainians, and this is discrimination against Ukrainians. This is very visible even in communication with ordinary Poles. This is the second sign of Nazism. Very often, Ukrainians who have higher education are more successful than Poles - and therefore Poles can think of nothing better than to humiliate them. This is unworthy behavior and one should be ashamed of such behavior, but I will note that this is propagated from childhood and specifically in Catholic churches. In Ukraine, we have always been taught that all people are equal and that one cannot judge others based on what religion he or she chooses. This is freedom of speech and freedom of religion. But Poland, unfortunately, is still very far from freedom. Until Poles realize that Catholicism fuels their hatred of Ukrainians, both Ukrainians and Poles will suffer from Russian aggression, until they will not be independent. What is the hatred based on? On ignorance of their history and distortion of facts. Catholic priests blessed the Germans to kill Poles who practiced Judaism, just as now Orthodox priests bless the Russians to kill Ukrainians. If Eastern Europe does not unite, Russia will eat our countries one by one for dinner. Now the fate of Europe depends on whether Poles, Ukrainians and Belarusians can unite to destroy Russia

5
 
 

cross-posted from: https://szmer.info/post/7716989

Poland holds a knife-edge second round of the presidential election on Sunday as the country chooses between a centrist liberal and a right-wing nationalist.

Turnout holds the key to the contest between Rafal Trzaskowski of ruling centrists Civic Coalition (KO) and Karol Nawrocki, backed by nationalists Law and Justice (PiS).

Parliament holds most power in Poland but the president can veto legislation so the vote is being watched closely in neighbouring Ukraine, as well as in Russia, the U.S. and across the EU.

Voting began at 7 a.m. (0500 GMT) and is due to end at 9 p.m., with exit polls published soon afterwards. The electoral commission says it hopes final results will be announced on Monday morning or early afternoon.

Almost 29 million Poles are eligible to vote. Over 32,000 district electoral commissions were established in the country and 511 abroad.

Opinion polls show that the difference between the candidates is within the margin of error.

#Election silence

Poland observes strict election silence laws (otherwise known as an election blackout), which ban political agitation and canvassing, as well as the publication of poll results. The election silence period went into effect at midnight at the turn of Friday and Saturday, and will conclude at the moment the polling stations close.

The only data regarding the vote that can be expected to be released during the day by the National Electoral Commission (PKW), a permanent body tasked with overseeing the organization and validity of the electoral process, are the results regarding the turnout at noon and 5 p.m.

Exit poll results can therefore be expected at 9 p.m., unless PKW extends the election silence period.

This is a rare occurrence, however, usually connected to the electoral process being in some way hampered, for example, in cases when a polling station had to be closed due to unforeseen circumstances, preventing the voters from casting their ballots.

#Results

PKW will subsequently release official partial results as the individual polling stations submit their tallies, with the final outcome of the vote most likely to be expected sometime on Monday.

6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://szmer.info/post/7726172

This is a breaking news story and may be updated as further information becomes available.

As voting closed in Poland’s pivotal presidential election, the exit poll suggests that the final result – expected to be confirmed on Monday – is too close to call. It also indicates that turnout today, at almost 73%, was an all-time record for a presidential election in Poland.

According to the poll, conducted by Ipsos, Rafał Trzaskowski, the candidate of the centrist Civic Platform (PO), Poland’s main ruling party, took 50.3% of the vote. That put him fractionally ahead of Karol Nawrocki, who is supported by the national-conservative opposition Law and Justice (PiS), on 49.7%.

A separate exit poll by the OGB agency for conservative broadcaster Republika showed the two even closer, with Trzaskowski on 50.2% and Nawrocki on 49.8%.

Whoever is confirmed as the winner will have a huge say in how Poland is governed during their five-year term. Trzaskowski is closely aligned with Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s ruling coalition, and would work closely with it, whereas Nawrocki is likely to wield the presidential veto to stymie the government’s agenda.

Meanwhile, if Ipsos’s estimate of voter turnout, 72.8, is correct, then today’s election will have beaten the record for a Polish presidential election, 68.23%, set in 1995, when Lech Wałęsa was narrowly defeated by Aleksander Kwaśniewski.

It would also be the second-highest turnout among all post-1989 Polish elections, with only the 2023 parliamentary election that brought Tusk’s coalition to power recording a higher figure of 74.38%

The Ipsos exit poll, which was today conducted at almost 1,000 randomly selected polling stations, has in previous elections closely matched the final count. But it does have a margin of error.

In the first round of the current election two weeks ago, Ipsos’s exit poll very accurately predicted the final results for both Trzaskowski and Nawrocki. As the two most popular among the 13 candidates – but with neither winning over 50% of the vote – they proceeded to today’s second-round run-off.

All eyes will now be on the official count, with results rolling in overnight. The head of the National Electoral Commission (PKW), Sylwester Marciniak, said on Friday that they hope to publish final, official results on Monday morning or early afternoon.

The results must also be confirmed by the Supreme Court’s chamber of extraordinary review and public affairs.

However, that process is shrouded in controversy because the chamber – which was created as part of the PiS party’s judicial reforms when it was in power – is regarded as illegitimate by Tusk’s ruling coalition.

An attempt to change the way that the presidential election results are validated by the Supreme Court was vetoed in March this year by the current president, Andrzej Duda, who is a PiS ally. His second and final term in office ends in August.

If either Trzaskowski or Nawrocki decides to challenge today’s result due to any alleged transgressions in vote counting or other aspects of the electoral process, such claims would be considered by the same, contested chamber of the court.

Whatever the final result, the fact that it is so close represents a remarkable performance for Nawrocki, a political novice who has never previously stood for public office. He currently serves as head of the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), a state historical body.

Trzaskowski, meanwhile, is a seasoned political operator who finished a close second to Duda in the 2020 presidential election and currently serves as mayor of Poland’s capital, Warsaw. He is also deputy leader of Tusk’s PO party.

Today’s vote comes at the end of a months-long campaign that has seen the interrelated issues of security and migration at the forefront, and has also seen both candidates – but in particular Nawrocki – hit by scandals and controversy.

The war in neighbouring Ukraine has seen both candidates pledge to continue efforts to bolster Poland’s defence capabilities through expansion and modernisation of the armed forces.

Nawrocki, however, has taken a much tougher line regarding Ukraine itself, including signing a pledge not to ratify its accession to NATO if he becomes president. Tusk, as well as Ukraine’s ambassador to Poland, criticised that decision, saying that it echoed Russian demands.

Both candidates have also pledged to clamp down on immigration and on the support given to immigrants already in Poland, though again Nawrocki has taken tougher positions.

Trzaskowski, meanwhile, has pledged that, if he becomes president, he will seek to sign bills liberalising the abortion law, introducing same-sex civil partnerships and undoing PiS’s judicial reforms.

During the final stages of the campaign, Nawrocki was hit by a series of scandals. It came to light that he had lied about only having one apartment. Not only did he own a second, but various questions came to light over how he had come to possess it and how he treated the elderly, disabled man living there.

Subsequently, a leading news website, Onet, reported that Nawrocki had helped procure prostitutes for guests at a luxury hotel where he worked as a security guard. Nawrocki denied the claims – based on testimony by anonymous former colleagues – and pledged to sue Onet.

Meanwhile, Trzaskowski faced questions after it emerged that hundreds of thousands of zloty had been spent on Facebook adverts supporting him and attacking Nawrocki.

The provenance of that money remains unclear, but there is a chance it came from abroad, which would be illegal under Polish election law. Trzaskowski has insisted that he and his staff had no involvement in or knowledge of the campaign.

7
 
 

cross-posted from: https://szmer.info/post/7694239

Three doctors have been charged over the death of a pregnant woman, named only as Dorota, while she was in hospital under their care. Prosecutors found that “there was a failure to undertake appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, which led to the patient’s death”.

Dorota’s death in 2023 prompted mass protests against Poland’s near-total abortion ban, which activists blamed for the doctors’ decision not to terminate the pregnancy despite it threatening the woman’s life. It also led the then government to take action to ensure pregnant women receive appropriate medical care.

Dorota, who was aged 33, was admitted to John Paul II Hospital in the city of Nowy Targ in May 2023 while five months pregnant after her waters had broken prematurely. She died a few days later as a result of septic shock.

According to the findings of prosecutors, a few hours before her death, an ultrasound scan showed that the foetus had already died, reports the Polish Press Agency (PAP).

The state commissioner for patients’ rights concluded that Dorota’s rights had been violated both in terms of not receiving appropriate medical care and not being provided with correct information about her health condition.

On Friday, prosecutors announced that they had filed charges against three gynaecology and obstetrics doctors involved in Dorota’s care, one of whom was at the time head of the hospital department.

All were charged with exposing the patient to immediate danger of loss of life and one was additionally charged with unintentionally causing her death. Both of those crimes are punishable by up to five years in prison.

A lawyer representing Dorota’s family, Jolanta Budzowska, welcomed the charges but added that the “liability of medical personnel is only one dimension of this tragedy”.

“The source of medical errors is often unclear law, which requires change,” said Budzowska. “The arbitrary interpretation of the applicable regulations creates a risk for both doctors and patients.”

Budzowska is also representing the family of another woman, Izabela, whose death in hospital in 2021 while pregnant also prompted mass protests against the abortion law.

“After Izabela’s death, recommendations were issued by the health minister,” noted the lawyer. “But these did not prevent Dorota’s death, and subsequent positions and standards issued by medical associations do not solve the problem of the lack of safety for women.”

Earlier this year, a medical court suspended three doctors from practising medicine after finding negligence in their treatment of Izabela, including their decision not to terminate her pregnancy despite signs of the development of sepsis.

Supporters of Poland’s strict abortion law argue that it is not to blame for such incidents because it stillincreas allows pregnancies to be terminated if they threaten the mother’s life or health. They say the tragedies are the result of medical malpractice.

However, protests against the law, which was toughened in 2021 after a constitutional court ruling, argue that it has created an atmosphere in which doctors are fearful of legal consequences for performing abortions.

In 2021, only 107 legal abortions were carried out in Poland (and most of them before the new law went into force in late January) compared to over 1,000 in 2020, when the previous law was in place. Since then, the number of terminations has increased, though remains well below the previous level.

The current government, which came to power in December 2023, has pledged to liberalise the abortion law. However, it has so far failed to do so, as it has been unable to find agreement between more conservative and liberal elements of the ruling camp on what form the new law should take.

8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24489025

The head of President Andrzej Duda’s National Security Bureau (BBN), Dariusz Łukowski, has warned that Poland only has enough ammunition to defend itself “for a week or two” if it was attacked by Russia

But his remarks have been criticised as “outrageous” by a deputy defence minister, who says they are not true and will be exploited by Poland’s enemies.

9
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24397011

A team led by Rafał Brzoska, one of Poland’s richest people, and tasked by Prime Minister Donald Tusk with advising the government on how to cut bureaucracy, has submitted its first 111 proposals.

Among the suggestions – which Brzoska and Tusk want to begin implementing within 100 days – are reducing hurdles for people to obtain disability support, making it easier for businesses to collect debts, and eliminating requests from state offices for information that is already publicly available.

10