this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
53 points (98.2% liked)
Furry
2740 readers
97 users here now
Description
General community for everything furry-related (discussions, texts, art, your own work, …)!
No matter if you have one or multiple fursonas (animal-based or not) or are just here to enjoy the artworks, all are welcome and respected here.
Rules
- Don’t be an asshole. While disagreements are normal in a discussions, personal attacks and harassment are going to be removed.
- Mark NSFW posts accordingly. Porn and nudity must not be posted here (we have dedicated communities for this kind of content).
- When posting artwork, cite the source and name the author. If possible with links to their socials. If the original source is unknown, at least link to the source where you got the image from.
- AI content is not welcome.
- You can still post discussions about it if the topic is something you consider important for the community.
- If you think something is AI, point it out (comment + report); but don't accuse someone of slopposting without a valid reason.
- Instance-rules of pawb.social apply.
- Don’t bring us in legal trouble.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
When you turn up saturation then contrast it reveals a lot of little artifacts like this, but the background doesn't have any. It could be that the subject was AI generated then pasted into a clean background.
Artifacts could exist for other reasons, such as multiple lossy compressions or use of Nightshade, but I doubt either of those would leave the background clean?
I would upload a comparison image of the same process performed on my own artwork which does not create such artifacts, but my instance takes like an hour to upload an image.
Can we please not accuse anyone of using AI without absolutely clear evidence. It can be very demoralizing for the artist to be wrongly accused.
I agree. It's insanely shitty.