videos
Breadtube if it didn't suck.
Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.
Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.
There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.
A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.
view the rest of the comments
Yes 100% if possible if your starting something new you should not come out swinging with complicated positions/theories/political identities that people don't understand nor have the power to achieve when in the immediate term all you're really going to be doing is trying to revive unions.
Look at recent insurgent political parties in europe that achieved at one point significan results, both left and right, a lot of them do say the "neither left nor rigbt" thing, even when its obvious which it is, they also have non-ideological names look
Reform, Podemos(we can), Chega (enough), 5 stars movement, that new greek party, hell even macron's "republic en marche" etc
So all I can say is corbyn should name his new party Solidarity or Revival or some anodyne shit like that.
5* movement isn't recent at all really, they were eclipsed by the fascist party years ago
And at one point they were in first place so my point remains, and now they're explicitly left-wing (idk how that happened), also I consider anything that had it significant results since the left-populist moment in the early 2010s recent.
And the fascist party you mentioned could also be an example of part of what I'm saying , they're not "neither left nor right" but "Brothers of Italy" is a lot more attractive than "Fascist party of italy".
I could add to this melenchon's "Insubmissive France" which is explicit about its political identity but namewise is a lot more anodyne than "Socialist party splinter group with a bunch of agglomerated trots party".
Corbyn might have a harder time saying this, but in his new party I’d use “neither left nor right”.
At this point in time, we need to be hiding our power levels.
Yeah that's where the "starting something new" part is more relevant, corbyn isn't new so it'd be a conversion of his, and his movement's, political identity into something else, even if its politics remain the same, and there's no guarantee that actually works out well. It'd be very hard for him.