this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
770 points (93.7% liked)

Memes

51486 readers
856 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

It isn't though, I have seen the original source of this claim and its bs. The author just picks and chooses when empires begin and end so that it fits their claim. I would concede the point if it were ever actually an average.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I mean yea that doesn't surprise me in the slightest honestly, even outside of the number itself being pretty meaningless in the first place it's very fuzzy what the actual dates are.

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not just Glubb. The Changing World Order by Ray Dalio also arrives at the 250 year number.

[–] daydrinkingchickadee@lemmy.ml -2 points 5 days ago

Cliodynamics and Structural-Demographic Theory suggests cycles of 200-300 years as well.