this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
185 points (97.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

2991 readers
592 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And? He's not a standard Democrat. This fickle purity testing is why the right keeps winning.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What the fuck is "purity testing"?

I'm complaining about him hiring Lerner. He's playing by standard DNC rules, at best now.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

What the fuck is “purity testing”?

It's what centrists say when people to their left have standards.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He's run a phenomenally lowercase-d democratic and candid campaign. Hiring one experienced DNC Communications chair does not compromise his platform. It might lead to that, but it might not. To judge based purely on that appointment, before anything has actually happened, is 100% purity testing.

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So losing faith that a candidate is going to stick by his word is now something called "purity testing"?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your faith is your business. Barking the failings of the lesser evil, in the wave of greater evil, with no good strong enough to replace them. Yeah, that's purity testing.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The lesser evil keeps getting more evil.