this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
262 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

12633 readers
621 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Today is a big day for the future of e-bikes in New York City. A hearing starts at 10 a.m. You can file a written comment until 5 p.m. You can also send an email to rules@dot.nyc.gov until 5 p.m

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

if you want to go faster use your muscles

Okay but the fact that you can say this without it being a joke proves how stupid this limit is.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Not at all no. This used to be a sort of self regulating system. Peoples ability to go fast with muscles alone usually goes away around the same point where their cognitive abilities become a hazard to the rest of traffic. The difference is that most young people could easily go 18mph or more while old people wouldnt even get past 10 without e-bikes. Basically e-bikes allow people to go beyond their limits. While that sounds cool, in this case it isnt.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, much better for old uncoordinated people to go back to using cars.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Said literally nobody. 15mph is plenty fast for getting around :) The more important part is making biking more attractive by building better infrastructure for it and actively restricting car traffic by slowing it down or diverting it out of cities.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So limit cars to 15 mph. I'm down.

Or do you just hate bikes?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like being alive and not being rammed by a 200kg combination of e-bike + human at speeds higher than 25kmh while riding my bike to work.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I like not being rammed by 2-10 tons of steel and lithium while i cross the street. Yeah. Lets limit cars to 15mph.

If you don't do that, but do limit ebikes, you're just an auto industry shill.

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And you're a troll, this isn't a zero sum game, making bikes safe matters, you complete weirdo.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

But making cars safe doesnt.

So you're just incentivizing a much more dangerous behavior. You are the problem.

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In a city with buses, subways, ferries, light rail... Shut up.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh so there are no cars?

Please go back to c/fuckcars@lemmynsfw

[–] cazssiew@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"drat my bike won't go at unreasonable speeds, my only solution must be abandoning my still perfectly functional bike and laying down several grand on the single least practical means of transportation in the city. What's a MetroCard?"

Shut. Up.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Okay but do people do that at all? Like, get around with cars on the street? I haven't been to ny in a few years but it feels like they do.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No. It would be like getting on a half pipe with knee pads but no helmet.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The thing with pedelecs and 25km/h is complicatedâ„¢

  • we distinguish e-bikes and pedelecs
    • self-driving electric bike
    • bike with electric pedal assist
  • motorized bikes are already a thing for a century
    • motorbikes… (driving license; 16 years+; real number plate; but 20 years+ for >45km/h)
    • moped has 45km/h limit and a kickstart pedal (driving license; 15 years+; insurance plate)
    • mofa has 25km/h limit and (can have) real bike pedals (driving test; 15 years+; insurance plate)
  • every motorized vehicle that can do more than 20km/h and doesn’t have a seat belt, mandates helmets
  • bike paths are only for bikes
    • outside of built-up area mofas were already allowed to use bike paths
  • at least one state banned motorized vehicles from forests

It probably was always possible to drive them as moped/mofa, don’t think it was specified what kind of motor.

Pedal assist doesn’t just stop at 25km/h, it also decreases with higher speeds.

But the point is that pedelecs effectively count as bike and not motorized vehicles. That means somebody younger than 15 can drive them, but you have to be at least 10 to be allowed to drive on streets/roads. Helmets are only mandatory for <12 years old kids on bikes.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If you're not limiting cars the same, you're just anti bike. Fuck off carbrain.

[–] basxto@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s the same. Those are motor limits, not driving speed limits. If you don’t meet them you just have to follow the stricter regulations.

Theoretically if you get an e-bike classified as a motorbike you could do 200 km/h on the motor way, just not on bike lanes. It just needs to be registerd, insuranced, have a proper motorbike license, wear helmet etc … like it’s the case with a car where it’s seat belt instead of helmet.

The speed limits are the same, I still have to follow regular 30km/h speed limits with my pedelec when I could do 45km/h downhill otherwise. Unless there are special signs somewhere, but so far I’ve only seen those for trucks/buses. Bikes are also entitled to street parking and parking lots since those are rules for all vehicles, it’s just impracticable. There is only a general rule to park space-saving.

It's not the same. Not exactly.

And, again, if we wanted to ditch cars completelh and have a lane for those alone, that would be cool, but we dont. So everything but cars is ghettoized, and im not okay stratifying tgat while cars are still in use.