this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
234 points (98.8% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7398 readers
7 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
234
Corn-Belt Votes Trump. Trump pressures Coke for sugar-based Coke in US. (www.npr.org)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by ReedReads@lemmy.zip to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
52 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Coca-Cola's move comes a week after the White House issued a statement by President Trump saying he had been talking to the soft drink giant about using cane sugar rather than high-fructose corn syrup in its signature drink.

Corn Refiners Association President and CEO John Bode predicts that an increase in using U.S. cane sugar will lead to a rise in foreign cane sugar imports.

Bode said in a statement to NPR, "Replacing high fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and expand the trade deficit."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Fuck HFCS & the US sugar program: they're the textbook example of US protectionist policies that cost the US more than the benefits

The Department of Agriculture administers the U.S. sugar program to support domestic sugar production through tools such as limiting the supply of sugar.

The program creates higher sugar prices, which cost consumers more than producers benefit, at an annual cost to the economy of around $1 billion per year.

and reduce employment in industries dependent on sugar while fucking everyone's health with shittier HFCS.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

But but but, we're making America healthy again.