this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
254 points (99.6% liked)

World News

45609 readers
2715 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Keir Starmer faces growing pressure from Labour’s key financial backers, trade unions, and business leaders to forge closer UK-EU ties after Trump’s new tariffs sparked economic concerns.

The U.S. imposed a 10% tariff on the UK and 25% on key sectors, endangering 25,000 UK car jobs.

A TUC poll shows 66% of Britons now support stronger EU ties. Labour MPs and pro-EU groups argue Starmer’s Brexit red lines are outdated.

Critics warn ignoring EU alignment risks deeper economic damage.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 47 points 3 days ago (7 children)
[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (6 children)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 days ago (5 children)

But hopefully not enough to give them a ton of privileges if they join the union again

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They should be given the best of privileges, but on the EU's terms: everything that is beneficial for the people in the UK and their economy, unless that's harmful for the union (such as exemptions from fishing quota or whatever). A stronger member leads to a strong whole, generally speaking.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They already had tons of privileges that other countries didn't get the last time they joined, see how that went.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

I now see you meant we shouldn't give them privileges other countries don't have either, I do agree with that. I most of all meant we should create the conditions that make it as attractive as possible to rejoin the EU. In some articles about a multi-speed EU they say the UK could join at the lowest speed in a similar way Norway and Switzerland are 'members' of the economic area, I think it's more realistic the UK will first have an agreement like those two countries before they become a full/regular member again.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)