259
Bots increase online user engagement but stifle meaningful discussion, study shows
(www.techexplorist.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
259 points (96.4% liked)
Technology
68723 readers
3779 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Exactly what the big platforms want, and exactly what's different about Lemmy. Low-volume, high-quality interactions
You realize that the only reason Lemmy hasn't become so enshitified is because the user base is too small for the corpos to seriously target it yet. The day Lemmy has more than a million users the army of bots will not be too far behind.
That will be only possible, if said companies will create their own instances, maybe even with ad support. Without that, all we gonna see is some corporations running said bots to promote their products. Just wait until someone is looking to but XY, then answer it with some semi-personalized with AI text to promote your own products. This can already happen with human-run accounts, but I'd choose some small business owner stumbling on Lemmy over a bot that AI generates me a response.
It's not enshittification, but there's a bunch of crappy rss bots on lemmy reposting low quality content pulled from various feeds. I feel like they've been abandoned and left to run creating internet litter around this site. I've started blocking them because I'm not against bots as a concept, but poorly written or with bad sources they can get pretty tiring. One of the things I appreciate about diggs $5 account fee is that it'd hopefully limit the amount of trolls/spam on the site.
At least they'll never find a complicit management. Still it doesn't matter, I'm going to enjoy this space while it's nice :)
The cool thing is that instances can decide on their own if they want to tolerate that or not
Idk man, back in November the place was pretty enshitified. Not sure if it was just left wing nut jobs but anybody with a political position even close to center or right got about 100 downvotes and got called a Russian troll or worse.
Since then it’s been a lot better though.
You know what to do fam… -100 votes for this guy.
Enshitification. I don't think you know what that word means.
I know exactly what it means so no need for your condescending comment.
So you deliberately used it wrong? Fairo.
Define "high quality" in this sense for me please
Real humans writing full sentences. Some platforms most of the comments are emojis or reaction gifs.