this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2025
335 points (99.1% liked)

RPGMemes

14124 readers
991 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You might say the knight is hulking and looming ominously, but does that mean 20 AC, 50 HP, one attack at +6 for 1d8+4… Or does that mean 24 AC, 500 HP, three attacks at 1d8+8 (slashing) +1d4 (negative energy)? Could be either! The range of possibilities is largely unbound and arbitrary.

That's more of a DM/GM description issue than a gaming issue. Like nothing about what you said is specific to DnD, it's just how the person is going to describe the person. But even then I prefer it that way. I don't know what the situation is going to be like until I try to fuck with that. Also, you could just ask to size him up. Insight checks exist, perception checks exist, etc. But I'm kinda pro-having the enemies vague. I loathe video games where I see a number above an enemies head and know whether or not I can defeat them. I'm here to roleplay, not be told immediately whether or not I can take the dude.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't need to know their exact stats, but I like (for example) having a system where you know a human's health ranges from 6 to 10, and a gun does at least 3 damage, so you can be pretty sure if you shoot him four times he's down. None of this, "Well, he's a 12th level accountant so he has 78 hp".

Maybe I mostly just dislike how vague HP is in D&D.

But it was probably mostly a GM issue.

I’m here to roleplay, not be told immediately whether or not I can take the dude.

I find it hard to roleplay when I don't know what is in the world. Things that are very different (high level stuff, low level stuff) getting basically the same description is distracting. In real life, you get a lot of information looking at someone.

Maybe I'm still just annoyed at that game where we were all 10th level and so were the basic ass soldiers.

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe I mostly just dislike how vague HP is in D&D.

D&D (and most derivatives) also has the issue of the only hit point that matters is the last one

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 1 week ago

Never thought about it before, but the two systems I like most don't do that.

In chronicles of darkness, you get penalties when any of your last 3 health boxes (out of 6-10) are marked. In fate, you start getting Consequences, and those both adversely affect you and provide bonuses for your opponents.

I think some people don't like this because it can cause a death spiral, where whoever gets injured first is likely to get more injured from the penalties. But, that makes sense for a lot of genres.

I routinely found it extremely irritating in BG3 when I'd do a sneak attack critical, and then the enemy would have like 3 HP left, and then they'd turn around and attack just as hard as if i'd done nothing. Unsatisfying.