this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

24595 readers
2758 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (5 children)

War on all Americans? Trump won the election and has good approval ratings.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The guy you are talking to has an account less than a day old and all he's done is suck orange nazi cock. If they are even a human then they are too stupid and arrogant to understand or accept any argument. No point in arguing or even talking to them.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

They're human. A bot wouldn't have so much trouble with spelling and grammar.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Blaming Trump for high egg prices 10 days after inauguration is not going to be a winning argument for the Democrats.

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Is war on Ukraine ended? The nazi traitor filth said day one, did he not?

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Are you going to point out the listings of promises he already accomplished?

Looking at the overall performance, voters are satisfied.

https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/approval/donald-trump/approval-rating

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bruh, just look at this one poll. Just look. Egg prices don't matter because of this one poll. Please look. Various pollsters. Please.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You always want to look at multiple polls if they are there.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's that why you have only linked the one you like over and over?

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn't pick one poll. I showed a list of like 5 polls.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Correct - You didn't pick a poll. You picked a website.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trump would 100% blame every existing problem on Biden the first week he came in, and will continue to blame anything he considers negative on him for years to come.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Both sides tell their side of the story. Right now the right is winning. More American people believe the Republican messages.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's fair to blame him when he shuts down the CDC in the midst of an avian flu outbreak.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

You are so funny. You get the timeline all wrong.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't mean that what he's doing is good for Americans, it just means Americans don't understand the consequences or don't care.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I have seen a lot of comments these days that voters are stupid, or something equivalent. I suppose that is all the Democrats got at this point.

[–] Sabin10@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

American voters are stupid, that's what conservative politicians have been working towards with 50 years of education budget cuts.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrbeano@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But there are way, way more comments, posts, and articles about how he's reneged on his promises & will continue to hurt people for the sake of hurting people... In the face of authoritarianism, you're worried about decorum?

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Based on his current approval rating, he is doing what he promised to do, which won him the election.

[–] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This is the most garbage logic. His approval rating does not directly equate to fulfilling promises. There can be cause and effect, but it's not guaranteed especially when there's so many factors that impact approval rating.

Presidents get a post election bump. It has nothing to do with fuffiling policy promises. Hell, the bump began before he took office, so obviously it has little to do with him fulfilling promises. Trump had a bump his first term too. But guess what. Literally every other president, including Biden, had a better overall approval rating at the beginning of a term than trump ever has. Time will tell where his approval lands.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There is never going to be a perfect metric on fulfilling campaign promises. The approval rating is a very good metric for that. Did someone said this is perfect metric?

Trump was acting more like the sitting president than Biden between election and inauguration. Of course that can result in a bump. For example, the Israel Hamas ceasefire. Trump was critical in getting that deal done even though he was not a sitting president at the time.

Your logic was very bad.

[–] FinnFooted@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (19 children)

I didn't say it wasn't even and imperfect metric. I'm saying that its almost no metric. Perhaps even evidence of poor performance to be honest. Because the approval bump is a repeatable and measurable phenomenon we observe after every election that has 0 to do with presidential policy or action. And his post election approval bump is the second worst in history, only below his own poor approval bump from his first term.

Information is relative to the environment and circumstances. Is doesn't exist in a vacuum.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What approval ratings are you looking at, last I checked he'd managed to go lower than Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago (9 children)

30% is not good approval ratings.

That's less than the 34% he had when Biden took the Presidency from him.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Good approval ratings with who? From what I've seen his approval ratings with Americans are almost as terrible as they were last time.

load more comments (1 replies)