News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I said the first time that CS-137 was very unlikely to be an isolated event...
It's rare in large quantities and only shows up like that as a result of nuclear weapons, of which more than you'd expect have been lost in the ocean.
Maybe it's just broken measurement devices, but every recall makes that explanation less likely.
What context is wikipedia missing from this investigation section about cs-137 that makes you think that there is more out there?
I mean...
That is bigger than the initial theory that it was just bad luck and some malfunctioning equipment...
Like, that says contaminated ore was smelted into iron, passed by air transmission to the shrimp factory and that's what caused it...
That means a shit ton went into iron, and with a 30 year half life that iron will become irradiated and now we got fucking cobalt 60 and that's around for like 50 years and way more dangerous.
What you quoted is a huge fucking deal, especially since it's grey market iron and who knows where it is.
Cs137 didn't really exist until after WW2, so when it pops up enough to be noteworthy, then it is almost always more than we initially found. The chances of us discovering that kind of contamination and coincidentally having found it all immediately just isn't plausible. It's almost always some sort of larger primary contamination like this steel plant.
While the discovered source is bad, its not as bad as where my mind went initially for the source of the Cs137:
I had wondered if it was Fukishima contaminated water discharge:
"TEPCO anticipates that the ongoing release of wastewater, currently exceeding 1.3 million metric tonnes, will span approximately 30 years. "
Why do you think a tiny bit of that is somehow relevant in steel? People usually should not eat steel. Ah the same time, it shields from the radiation, so the steel itself is safe, since only the surface fraction can radiate into the environment. And that not inside your body, unless you ignore part 1.
Because I gave a couple years of my life to the most stressful school in America so the US government could spend well over six figures teaching me about nuclear energy and radiation damage...
You could just read a textbook or even Wikipedia and have you're questions answered tho.
But to answer you main question:
Something with a 30 year half life will make the steel itself radioactive overtime. If it is in low enough quantities and deep enough to initially read safe, that's even worse cause it's hard to find, but a decade from now not only will it still have most of the CS 137 in it, it will have made the steel itself radioactive. And by that point will likely read as radioactive, but who tests a decade old piece of metal to see if it's now radioactive?
Like, just because you don't understand why this is a big deal, doesn't make it ok
Cesium-137 (or should I also call it CS 137 like the expert?) activating Iron? How is that supposed to happen?
So much bullshit talking about how dumb I am, talking about your superb qualifications, and then you fuck up like that. Well deserved, really.
Let me just make sure this gold nugget stays out of your reach, user "givesomefucks":
Because I gave a couple years of my life to the most stressful school in America so the US government could spend well over six figures teaching me about nuclear energy and radiation damage...
You could just read a textbook or even Wikipedia and have you're questions answered tho.
But to answer you main question:
Something with a 30 year half life will make the steel itself radioactive overtime. If it is in low enough quantities and deep enough to initially read safe, that's even worse cause it's hard to find, but a decade from now not only will it still have most of the CS 137 in it, it will have made the steel itself radioactive. And by that point will likely read as radioactive, but who tests a decade old piece of metal to see if it's now radioactive?
Like, just because you don't understand why this is a big deal, doesn't make it ok
How can one radioactive thing make another thing radioactive?
You're trying to act like you know about this stuff, but you act like one of the most basic things about radiation is a fucking fairy tale...
I figured out why you never learn anything at least
By your logic, every CRT is extremely radioactive? And instead of actually finally looking it up, you really double down.
Now quote a source or accept how utterly wrong you were and quite frankly, fuck off with confidently spreading FUD you made up with fake authority while talking down on others.
If a company could avoid a recall by paying for more retesting they would do that instantly.
It’s not testing error.
Cs-137 is used to kill bacteria and such. It's used in a bunch of industries, but fishing is a biggie.
And yeah, cesium is also chemically toxic.
But it's useful, so we make a bunch of it each year.