this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
517 points (98.5% liked)
Mildly Interesting
24168 readers
120 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Wishy-washy question. New diseases emerge all the time, and what do you mean by "deadly"? Almost all diseases can be deadly some of the time, almost none of them are always deadly. We've had several "new" diseases that are deadly often enough to be worrying, but no wide spread new ones that are as deadly as rabies. Also, what does it mean for a disease to be "new"? Because of a lack of sexual procreation, and therefore lateral gene transfer, neither viruses nor bacteria are species-forming. Every new individual ever is a new diverging point for a line of successors, and that line will never, can never merge back with the rest of the population. The point at which a strain has mutated enough to be called a new disease is basically a matter of opinion.
Again, wishy-washy question. What is commonplace? I don't know a lot of people who would still object to gay people's right to marry, but I personally don't know a single married gay couple. Is it commonplace? I can't tell.
Clear yes. A big part of the country had a very dangerous and still going meltdown over it, but still, the answer is a clear yes.
Clear no, if by a small margin on two occasions.
Again with the "commonplace". It's hard to define. I'm going by "illicit drugs" meaning drugs that were illegal on a federal level in 1998 (not that this will make that much difference). By my gut feeling, I would say this was already "commonplace" in the eighties and nineties. Though it does seem to have increased since then.
There have been a small number of cases where it actually worked, but to my knowledge nothing universally applicable. AIDS treatments, however, have become so good that the disease is no longer seen as a major problem of our times.
That was always a non-starter, and even people in 1998 should have known that. Cancer is not one disease, at best you can cure a small specific subset of cancers.
Brick and mortar stores have become fewer, but it's hard to tell how much of that was Internet shopping and how much was market consolidation into powerful big-box stores.
We didn't even come close to "most" during Covid. Most jobs just cannot be done from home.
What's "full scale"? There were certainly a few that were "full-scale" for the other side. Shit, there only just was one shortly before this poll was conducted…
Actually, didn't Hillary get more votes than Trump?
Some cancers have been cured
Gay marriage is still effectively illegal in many areas and the push for completely illegal is constant
"Most jobs" could be done remotely depending on how you'd see most. Almost all office jobs can be done remotely. If you're in front of a computer all day, you are likely able to do it remotely. You do not have to physically be in an office. If I had to guess, they asked a bunch of office workers as they had more time to actually go through questions like this
I contend that the US has not stopped being at war since at least Regan or Bush sr. See: Afghanistan starting with the support of the mujahideen
We have a type of stem cell treatment used in extreme blood cancer situations that had cured a number of people of AIDS. To my understanding, it should work for most patients, but it's a risky and extreme enough procedure that it's not worthwhile compared to the standard treatment regimen. But if you also get leukemia, the treatment might cure both diseases.
With one given treatment, maybe. As far as I'm aware, there aren't any cancers that are in principle untreatable, though a handful are very difficult to cure people from. We have a wide variety of treatments for a wide variety of cancers, some of which are now really close to 100%.