this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
220 points (91.0% liked)
Anarchism
3139 readers
38 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
Other anarchist comms
- !anarchism@slrpnk.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.blahaj.zone
- !anarchism@hexbear.net
- !anarchism@lemmy.ml
- !anarchism101@lemmy.ca
- !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You're judging them while they have the boot heel of Western imperialism on their necks.
There it is! The goalposts just got kicked into another galaxy.
The goalpost is "actually existing socialism actually exists"
That's it. The fact that it exists under siege simply means that our goal should be to lift the boot off their necks, instead of wasting time criticizing them. Are they imperfect, flawed, with tragic excesses and rightist deviations? Yes. That's beyond the scope of anything we can possibly do. Our project, if you actually believe in anything other than capitalism, is to use our privileged position within the core to fight for the defeat of the empire: lift the blockades, end the espionage, stop regime change.
Right now it's Venezuela on the chopping block. You will help them far more by fighting the US than by criticizing Maduro.
Defenses of "AES" always equivocate on whether it is actually socialism.
At best, the term is a deliberate lie, but the situation is much worse.
As soon as the characterization of socialism is challenged, it is walked backed, and the challenger is gaslighted for saying that what was said moments earlier was ever said.
"AES" is a nonsense concept defended by nonsense arguments.
It's the only socialism that actually exists, hence, actually existing socialism.
So, choose. Do you want capitalism, or the only existing alternative? In Venezuela you can support Maduro, or you can support Trump's regime change. Those are the only options that exist. Pick one.
You insist it is socialism.
When someone correctly objects that socialism not yet exists, you deflect and make excuses.
Socialism is worker control of production. Chinese workers being employed by companies in China is not socialism.
"AES" is obscurantist nonsense.
China commanded the economy to shut down to implement the zero COVID policies, it likely saved the lives of millions of workers. That's not something any other continental capitalist country could even attempt, because in capitalist countries the market is in command. There were a few islands (or semi-islands like South Korea) which could boast similar successes, but they were clear outliers that benefited from not having land borders. The rest of us live at the whim of the market and we were all marched to our deaths.
That convinced me that actually existing socialism actually exists. It's not perfect, with many capitalist compromises and internal flaws, but politics are in command.
When I point out that you have to pick a side, you vacillate. You insist that there aren't any sides worth choosing so you can avoid dirtying your hands in the real world. You just retreat into the perfect socialism that does not exist and will only ever exist in your head. You have removed yourself from the struggle entirely. You might as well not even exist.
Chinese workers do not control production in China.
Do you agree or disagree?
I am not interested in the deflections to apologetics.
The Party controls production and workers control the party. In capitalist countries, markets control the parties. In socialist countries, the Party controls the markets.
Politics are in command.
You aren't interested in the real world. You're only interested in the perfect socialism that exists in your imagination and no where else.
If workers control production, then all are free to dissociate from the Party at will, to form a new party, or have no association with any party.
The facts are that the Party controls the state, and the state controls workers. Therefore, all workers are bound involuntary to one party that determines their fate.
Denying that Chinese workers are subordinated under state power is sophistry and apologetics.
The fact of the matter is that over 90% of Chinese citizens support the CPC. You're confusing individualist tendencies with socialism. The citizens of the PRC don't have to join the party, they have 100 million members but 1.4 billion citizens. The party is supported because it consistently improves the quality of life of the working classes of China in a regular and planned fashion. Whole Process People's Democracy is core to the idea of the PRC's consensus-building and direction.
Standard of living is quite high and rapidly rising. For example, purchasing Power in 2022 was 25 times higher than 1978. The gap between rural and urban development has long been acknowledged and is already something worked on. The famous poverty eraducation campaign was focused on just that. Read The Metamorphosis of Yuangudui to see what that looks like in practice.
Another consistent metric is perceptions of democracy:
For more reading, The East is Still Red, Socialism in Power: On the Theory and History of Socialist Governance, and Socialism With Chinese Characteristics: A Guide for Foreigners are all great for understanding how the PRC works. ProleWiki's page on the People's Republic of China is also good if you just want an in-depth summary.
Support is not control.
The state is run democratically, both within the party and outside of it, by the working classes. You're drawing a line between the state and the rest of society as something outside of class struggle, not within it.
In what way is AES "nonsense?" Countries where public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy and the workint class in control of the state factually exist. It isn't a "deliberate lie" because you either disagree with that or with the understood definition of socialism.
No, you're just desperate for an excuse to dismiss valid criticisms
Thanks for the feedback.
You're welcome!