this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
273 points (96.0% liked)

Comic Strips

22877 readers
2900 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

tell that to the user whom I replied that.

"I think the term "cheating" inherently means that the person not involved isn't fine with it. "

isn't fine with it had zilth to do with consent.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

"I think the term "cheating" inherently means that the person not involved isn't fine with it. "

Is precisely correct.

Edit: in clarification. If your stated, mutually agreed upon, boundaries aren't being broken then you aren't being cheated on. If you're ok with your partner fucking other people, but told them you aren't for some reason, then I guess them fucking someone else would technically be cheating. But you should really learn how to accurately describe your boundaries with your partner.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

yes, but that was a response to consent in sex, and not being ok with it, isn't the same category as "third party not consented to sex" which implies rape".

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You were responding to

I think the term "cheating" inherently means that the person not involved isn't fine with it.

again. "not being fine it" ≠ "not consenting for sex not isn't involved with". when people have sex only the consent of persons involved in matters. still a shitty thing to do.