I have been reading on The Document Foundation blog about the ODF and how Microsoft basically gaslighted us all into believing the OOXML is truly an open standard when it actually doesn't even use the ISO's standardised version of strict OOXML as a default in his office suit, which obviously makes ODF the better choice; but I am not knowledgeable about the PDF.

From what I've found, it was developed by Adobe up until 2008; since then, it is an "open standard" supposedly developed by the ISO.

Does this mean the Portable Document Format is legit the way ODF is? If not what would be the open alternative to PDF that ODF is to Microslop's?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

DOCX is supposedly an open standard too, the thing is neither Microsoft nor Adobe fully follow it and instead opt to make it slightly incompatible in order to make it hard for competitors to use it without issues.

EEE tactics.

[–] OfficeMonkey@lemmy.today 5 points 1 week ago

docx is OOXML, Open Office XML.

However, it was definitely written to ensure existing doc files could be fully supported, so a lot of the format is "bit 7: if enabled, use Word for Mac 5.0 layout engine." So... Documented, yes. Usable, no.

PDF, as mentioned, is very similar. The format is available, but no one really wants to implement ALL of it.