this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2026
556 points (98.4% liked)

News

36618 readers
2007 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 79 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Man this country needs to get serous about juries because it seems that there's no point to them.

Also what the fuck is "concealing a document" and how the fuck is it a crime.

Additionally, how is it not double-jeopardy to convict someone of

  1. Firing a firearm
  2. Firing a firearm while firing a firearm
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 41 points 5 days ago

They used to say "you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sanwich." then that guy threw a ham sandwich at that ICE agent. Then the grand jury refused to indict him twice.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Having been to jury duty last year. They really hit you with a ton of propaganda. They basically try to brainwash all potential jurors before even getting to actual jury selection. People need to know thier rights. They do not in fact have to vote guilty based on the instructions of the judge. They are supposed to make up thier own minds. It's intended to be a check and balance on the judicial system.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They basically try to brainwash all potential jurors before even getting to actual jury selection. People need to know thier rights. They do not in fact have to vote guilty based on the instructions of the judge. They are supposed to make up thier own minds. It’s intended to be a check and balance on the judicial system.

I'll say! I came this close to being on a jury, they need 12 plus some number of alts (3?) and I think I was down to < 20 at that point. Anyway, when questioned on the "following instructions" bit I think I waffled just enough on that to get bounced.

But yeah, fuck that: we need more jury nullification on things like this. Don't bow to "the law" if you think it's bullshit.

I waffle on being honest when answering such questions, knowing it will target me for removal, and saying what they want to hear so I can get on the jury and do the job correctly. It's a tough call, in large part because I have IBS, and could need to run to the bathroom at anytime. And being required to not do that makes it more likely to occur (anxiety is a trigger among other things).
The jury I did get selected for was sort of the opposite. The prosecution didn't "prove" thier case, but it was still obvious the guy was guilty. They only needed 10 of 12 to convict at that time. He would have been free if they needed 12 because one guy clearly said he would never vote to convict because the prison system itself was unjust. I kinda agree with him too though.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I got out of jury conscription by phrasing my refusal in terms of religion. They let my whole group go, I think because of my sermon.

It's pretty wild that you can get out of jury duty for religion but not for secular reasoned principles. I would prefer not to talk about religion but I was desperate to escape.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 12 points 5 days ago

I think it's supposed to be for like deleting logs or financial records when a search is imminent. But in that case it's based on the stuff you're concealing containing evidence of a crime. Some zines aren't that.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 4 points 4 days ago

This is at least 2.5 of jeopardy