this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
154 points (90.1% liked)

Selfhosted

57567 readers
1032 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Discord announced they're going to help Petie T collect selfies of us all I've been working on a self hosted alternative mostly for my mates. I had five goals in mind when I started this:

  • Text Channels
  • Voice channels
  • Screen Sharing
  • End to end encrypted DMs
  • Able to run on pretty much any web hosting

I've reached that point now and figured why not slap the GPL on it and send it out into the wild.

I'm sure there'll be lots of bugs and I don't think it will scale well. I never set out to make something that would grow into a behemoth that's used for customer support and all sorts of shit.

The goal was to make something that covers that trifecta of text/voice/screensharing, without relying on P2P connectivity, and able to do it well for small groups of people.

There are more features I have in mind if it gets any interest:

  • Rate limiting on backend requests
  • Quasar app with the ability to add more than one server (the frontend is already built in Quasar and I started writing some code for it but I'm mostly building this for myself + friends where I host my own instance so I've not given it much attention)

So yeah, I'm not a professional dev, this is a hobby for me. Would be cool to see if anyone manages to get it running.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrippinMallard@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Would I be able to sign into multiple servers simultaneously? In case I have 2 friends hosting this on their own separate servers?

I care about that more than federation.

[–] briffy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This will probably be the first update I release. I've pre emptively built the front end in Quasar and there's even some bits of commented out code in there from where I started looking at storing authentication data per server. The plan as I see it, and I think this makes sense, is to have the web app based front-end be for people that want to run their own contained instance of both the API and front-end but then also have a Quasar desktop based app that has server switching built in. This then allows the server owner to just run the API if they want and let the user worry about how they connect.

It hasn't been a priority for me at the moment because I'm literally the only person running a server. 😅

Now that it's out in the wild, my next focus will be on the multi server side of things and making the text channels a bit more functional than just plaintext.

[–] TrippinMallard@lemmy.ml 3 points 23 hours ago

Sounds awesome! No rush, I'm a big believer in taking the time to do it right, not twice.

Just wanted to let you know that I find value in that + feel like it could help adoption especially in the self hosting community.