this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
522 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

64023 readers
640 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fork time? Maybe all the anti-systemd zealots were right all along...

Edit: To address whether it is likely that this change will affect users: Gnome is planning a stronger dependence on userdb, the part of systemd where this change is being implemented. https://blogs.gnome.org/adrianvovk/2025/06/10/gnome-systemd-dependencies/

Final Edit: The PR has been merged into main.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] amadaluzia@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Other inits aren’t even commenting, let alone complying.

This would be a fair point, if systemd wasn't more than an init system. While a service manager (init system) is included, systemd is a system manager. OpenRC, runit, and other init systems do not need to comment because their only task is to mount the necessary file systems, setup the device manager, and start daemons1. systemd as a system manager not only needs to manage services, but it also needs to manage devices, logs, the hostname, etc.

Does this mean systemd is not bloat? Not at all, but it is not as fat as you think it is. Your system could honestly be fatter without systemd if you try to replicate everything it does with external applications. Does this mean systemd should also be justified to add an optional field for your date of birth? I guess I would say it's weird on it's own. However, given the context, I believe they are doing what they can.

[–] Internet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Your system could honestly be fatter without systemd if you try to replicate everything it does with external applications.

Maybe so, but systemd's bloated feature creep still leads to security vulnerabilities. Another systemd root access exploit was just discovered a couple of days ago.

[–] amadaluzia@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Unfortunate. However, it seems that is snapd's fault. Here's the important part from the article:

Ubuntu automatically deletes old files from the /tmp directory after a certain number of days. During this cleanup, an important directory used by snap-confine may get removed.

Ubuntu configured systemd-tmpfiles to clean out /tmp after some days. That's why the issue is only present in Ubuntu systems. Therefore, systemd was doing it's job, and it just so happened to create the perfect conditions for a vulnerability in Ubuntu.

[–] Internet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

That is a fair point, actually. If there were a theoretical systemd-free Ubuntu it may just tell something else like tmpreaper to clean on the same schedule and create the same vulnerability.