this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
0 points (NaN% liked)

Memes of Production

1518 readers
1018 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
0
Libertarians (europe.pub)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Silliari@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au
 

Updated to remove Bakunin and Chomsky

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean can we like not fuck with Chomsky anymore?

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Idk. He's alright for baby anarchists, I think.

It's not like Bakunin was too great on everything, either.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

chomsky is like the modern tankie? Supportive of the russian invasion and a genocide denier. (cambodian genocide)

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You are propagating misinformation. Chomsky challenged some sloppy reporting by the NYT. He never denied the atrocities.

The degree Chomsky is becoming demonized even in anarchist spaces is very childish and irresponsible.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

oh yea? and where is your source then? and on what? Russian invasion? or the genocide? you are defending a guy who hung out with epstein on his little plane.

He is not your friend.

[–] unfreeradical@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Chomsky sat on an airplane, and criticized NYT reporting on atrocities in Cambodia.

Neither are bad acts.

His position on the Russian invasion is a standard leftist position, which includes a proper criticism of US imperialism and NATO expansion as antecedents of the war, in contrast to the US nationalist position of demonizing and blaming Putin, while also denying or glorifying US and NATO expansion.

Your information is not accurate, and your judgments are not thoughtful.

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

ah yes ofcourse - Evil nato expansion is why russia had to "defend itself"

which is not a "standard leftist talking point". it's a standard tankie point. Nato expansion was very very wanted. polands entire foreign policy was around getting it. US didnt even wanna expand.

problem with that point is simple. It's not a reason to invade and kill people. US is bad yes, but why the fuck is US bad when Russia invades? it's an excuse for war. excuse for imperialism.

Looks like I gave up explaining tho 🤷 at this point I dont think either of us were trying. Enjoy thinking chomsky is worth defending.