this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
314 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

4782 readers
8 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The ruling will have enormous impacts for transgender residents in the state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MissesAutumnRains@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't hear much about Montana, but this kinda strikes me as unexpected from them.

[–] LordMayor@piefed.social 60 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Some of those sparsely populated states have strong personal liberty biases and strong anti-government biases. This makes for seemingly contradictory—at least to liberals—policies.

They might protect trans rights while also advocating for unregulated slaughter houses, unfettered drilling and letting any random rancher use public lands for their herds.

It’s consistent when viewed from the rugged individualist/keep the government outta my business viewpoint.

[–] baines@piefed.social 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

it’s nice to see personal freedom used not as a dog whistle for misogyny or racial attacks

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh no, they still do that too

[–] baines@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

oh awesome, good to know my faith in humanity is still accurate

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It’s a sad state, but at the very least we can all try to be the kind of human that restores someone else’s faith in humanity.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 29 points 1 month ago

Montana in particular has a surprisingly progressive constitution. It was only enacted in 1972, largely in response to rampant corruption in the state. Montanans have the "right to a clean and healthy environment," included because of the abuses of the mining industry, for example.