this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
139 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

84143 readers
2302 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lime@feddit.nu 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it's an open source component built on the same system as ublock. it's good for firefox that they add stuff people actually want.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

They could just have easily built in the ublock origin plugin and not gone with braves implementation, a browser that is plagued with justified scandal.

Why Firefox would tie its fate to its disgraced founder is beyond me.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rust is faster than JavaScript.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sure, so they should have used some of that AI cash to rebuild ublock origin in rust, or push it further along the path to web assembly its already on.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The code is literally right there for the taking. Why would they spend the time rebuilding something when they could just have it for free?

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because then they would have something better and would have improved one of the most popular extensions in their browser?

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

They are quite literally taking the "if you don't like it, fork it yourself" approach. Who said they aren't going to make changes/improvements on top of it?

I don't see anyone else mentioning it but this is also probably because brave browser is published under the MPL license so the licenses are actually compatible between projects. They don't want to implement completely from scratch because there is a compatible existing implementation that they can build on top of instead of starting from scratch.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

...because he also founded firefox?

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hes also a bigot that was removed from leadership at Mozilla that has run multiple scams via Brave, all while taking Thiel bucks. What's your point?

[–] lime@feddit.nu 5 points 2 days ago

i think i misunderstood your earlier reply, i thought you were talking about eich as the founder of brave, but you meant that he was the founder of firefox.

yeah he sucks.

i don't think he wrote the adblocker though.

[–] winni@piefed.social -2 points 2 days ago

i guess they receive some cash to distribute brave malware