this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
825 points (99.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39503 readers
3644 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Last I heard they were still in the process. Has it been finalized yet?

Edit- Awaiting the OK from Texas judges.

It would cost the Onion $81k a month for the domain. The best part is that Jones is going through bankruptcy, having to sell off almost all of his belongings to compensate the families he harassed and slandered (libelled?)

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

both. libel is print, slander is speech, he did both. some jurisdictions have rolled both crimes into slander to stop confusing the public.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The most perfectly cast part in all of cinema.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 10 hours ago

Idk, have you seen Matthew McConaughey in "Surfer, Dude"?

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be both if he says it on a podcast and then writes an article?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did he write an article? I thought he always did spoken.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

I was under the assumption infowars was also a website with blogs or dumb articles on it. I have no idea, though because I had no reason to visit his website.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, can we get ahold of the cue cards?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Still doesn't count unless the cue cards were shown to the public.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Apparently finalized a few days ago. But the news was published in The Onion, so you can be forgiven for thinking it might be satire.

[–] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, they're posting it all over the place. I've seen other platforms also posting it everywhere.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the fact that onion is posting something all over the place does not mean anything, they seem to be taking it as seriously as all their other news

this is the freshest info: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/20/business/infowars-alex-jones-the-onion.html

they are waiting for a judge, they have a wish, but they own/rent/control anything at this time.

"other platforms" reposting that does not mean anything. same as it did not mean anything when they posted the same false information 18 months ago:

if anything, it is nice example of why we need professional media collecting and verifying news before releasing them and why random people shouting on social networks are not news

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is the best article I've found, and it's more recent than the NYT article you've posted:

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/bankruptcy-law/the-onions-infowars-takeover-follows-complicated-legal-journey

I still find dedicated legal reporting to be better than general reporting. And this is a complicated history touching on a lot of different areas of the law.

But the key fact here is that Alex Jones was allowed to keep control over the business assets while his appeals are pending, but has run out of money and cannot continue running his own business. At that point, the receiver overseeing things (where Alex Jones can run the business but can't transfer assets out or pay anything not directly related to running the business) saw that things had changed enough that he needed to keep the business assets valuable, and that Alex Jones himself couldn't.

So this licensing deal is a way to keep the assets valuable: keep paying rent on the studio itself, keep all the broadcasting and recording equipment under one roof, keep all the unexpired contracts.

If Alex Jones can't come up with a plan to actually pay the rent and keep all the stuff, the court is basically going to have no choice but to agree that there's no way to keep things as they are while the appeals wind through the system, and a temporary licensing agreement is the best option until the appeals go through.

Most of the reporting doesn't seem to appreciate that Jones' prospects of blocking this in the courts is dependent on a practical hurdle, not just a legal one: he can't afford to keep it. That's what's changed since December 2024 when The Onion's first attempt to buy this stuff was blocked (by another federal bankruptcy court, with a different judge than this state court judge overseeing the receiver).

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

thank you for the tip, finally some relevant details 😆

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

Not finalised. Needs court approval.

[–] homes@piefed.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would cost the Onion $81k a month for the domain

all things considered, that could be renegotiated with the registrar now that Jones is no longer the owner. It's no longer worth that as it's not raking in Jones-level revenue. Sure, it's still worth a lot, especially with The Onion owning it, but, still, not $81k/mo.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The licensing deal is for more than just the domain. It's like hundreds of squatter domains, too (including, hilariously, goblinlove dot com), and the trademarks.

And the reason why it's exactly that amount isn't about the cost of the domain. It's that the physical studio's rent is about $75k/month, and they need to keep that lease active long enough to buy the whole shebang once Alex Jones' appeals run out.

[–] homes@piefed.world 1 points 12 hours ago

So they would be in holding of the whole property… On the flipside, there’s so much crazy shit they can do with it, lol

[–] rImITywR@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That $81K/mo isn't going to the registrar. Its going to the manager of Jone's debt to be distributed to his creditors, including the families of Sandy Hook.

[–] homes@piefed.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

oh, my mistake

The deal calls for The Onion to pay $81,000 a month to license the Infowars.com domain and brand name, which the receiver says will "cover carrying costs to preserve and protect the assets of the receivership estate" until an appeal filed by Jones is decided and the path is cleared for a sale.

I see, so it's temporary, although that appeal could take years

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it is not temporary and it is not permanent. there isn't ANYTHING yet. they have a wish they brought to a judge and now they wait for what the judge will decide. if the judge decides to their liking, then it will be temporary...

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

A very important point is that the judge can't just reject the deal and let Alex Jones continue forward. The whole reason why the licensing deal is coming to fruition now (instead of in 2024 when he first lost control, or after all the appeals are exhausted) is because this middle ground became untenable: Alex Jones can't afford the studio's rent and the creditors are going to seize all the physical assets if they're not being actively used to run a profitable business to preserve the status quo.

If the status quo is no longer an option, the court will have to order that SOMEthing happen.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 7 points 1 day ago

81k per month, that's wild

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

A deal was signed, but it needs approval from a Texas court before it can be finalised.