this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
1037 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

85837 readers
3978 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 258 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

Why would the LLM tool have access to send recovery emails to non account verified emails at all?

That’s insane.

[–] vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 137 points 4 weeks ago

Because AI bros are incredibly deluded about both the capability of AI, and by extension their own capabilities using AI>

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 74 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

should’ve asked it to delete the database instead, why else would it have that level of permissions.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

Oh, man, I hope someone tries this.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 10 points 4 weeks ago

Heh. Watched an old episode of Scorpion yesterday. The one with the armed hostage-takers who just had the one demand to the social media data mining company, to delete all the data they've mined. I amused myself a lot, by uttering "I like these guys".

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Drop Table suddenly becomes the newest baby name fad.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 54 points 4 weeks ago

Who else is going to have access to it when you keep laying off all the people?

[–] guitarfosec@infosec.pub 42 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Because one of the biggest companies on the planet that has issues with account takeovers clearly has no internal red team working on this stuff.

[–] mint_tamas@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I guarantee they do have a red team that most likely flagged this as an obvious and severe risk. It was ignored by suits experiencing AI psychosis.

[–] 4grams@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I don’t know, more and more of those teams these days are being headed up by the same folks. Most on the ground, in the weeds know what not to do but the ivory tower keeps building more and more floors without ever updating the foundation.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago
[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's because they move fast and break things. They think that makes them cool.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 7 points 4 weeks ago

Let's mix these chemicals and see what happens. No funds for lab coats or protective glasses. We got a bottom line to feed.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 weeks ago

It's not insane. It's advanced!

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn't even a hack, it's just poorly written endpoints.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Would you consider phreaking equivalent to hacking? This is AI phreaking.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 weeks ago

Kinda.

If you designed a publicly addressable system since 1985 and didn’t design it for security then you’re asking for it.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not phreaking. Social engineering.

The entity being manipulated is not human so I would not classify it as social engineering, even if similar techniques are used (help me my grandmother needs info).

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago

So, I'm currently developing a chatbot for my company. If an LLM needs to do something, a developer must build a tool. It just so happens that this tool that was built did not take traditional security into account. Really it should only be using the tools already built for users, but it seems the Jr. Devs that have been replacing seniors do not have the sensibilities yet.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

I need to set aside some time to read that although I'm not an anarchist myself.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

It was largely overblown due to it getting banned. It was also published in the height of the Vietnam War, when the big evil communists were coming to brainwash your children into eating each other. It has a lot of blatantly incorrect info, which could be outright “blow up in your face” dangerous to anyone attempting the things in it. It’s not all wrong, but certain recipes have incorrect info that could easily lead to accidents.

Also fair warning, the UK will give people hard prison time simply for owning it. So maybe keep that shit onion-encrypted if you’re in the UK.

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thanks for the warning on the blowing up! Well, I'm certainly not in authoritarian UK.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

published in the height of the Vietnam War

your children into eating each other.

What is '69 ?

I linked to the Wikipedia article, not the handbook inself. And more for the (obsolete) phreaking content than the (highly dangerous) explosive content.

[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago

Hold on, do you expect Facebook to pay a human to deal with the inventory? Come on now.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Recently I had to cancel an order. The support for the company was an LLM bot. I accidentally mistyped a number in the order id. It accepted it anyways refunded every order on my account that includes the product I wished to cancel.

I tired to get to a human to correct the mistake and couldn't their phone number is an LLM bot their only chat is an LLM bot.

It use to not be. But now I'm sitting here the order in my hand cause the bot didn't cancel it. But like 30 orders from the last few years have all been refunded to me.

I tried to reach em a few more times but couldn't and it's been like a month. I just have like 2 grand usd that I shouldn't and no way to give it back.

So that's fun.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder how long you need to keep that money aside before you can spend it?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

That's amazing

Maybe I ought to be taking more advantage of this era of rampant incompetence

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Would sincerely love to know the name of the company. You know, to avoid them. Yup. I’m sure that’s the reason.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I hope you saved what you could from that exchange, as well the attempts to contact them. If they ever notice, their AI mistake will become your problem to deal with, (and the kind of news story to end up on a Steve Lehto video).

If that happened to me, I'd have a chat with my bank, "please help me return this money to where it came from, it was payed in error. They have no way to contact a human and I don't want them to accuse me of fraud down the line".

[–] rnkn@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I tried this and couldn't get it to work. Disappointed.