this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
20 points (95.5% liked)
Asklemmy
54923 readers
235 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The fuck? Everything NATO did was against the Serbs, they declared no fly zone, bombed them, NATO members like Germany armed and supported anti-Yugoslavian separatists, US armed and traind Bosnaks militias, US propaganda was against Serbs all the time, you can even see that continuing today when a hacks like BE attack antiimperialists.
That literally is what happened. NATO let the Srebrenica genocide happen willingly. All the receipts are in the video.
In any case it's all adhoms against BE so as usual safe to say I'm right.
I don't even know how to respond to historical revisionism of such brazen unreality level. You seriously just fucking ignored decade of NATO destroying Yugoslavia because BE, whose open nonsense against AES is well know, said so.
You can ignore a 30 minute video full of receipts and substitute in your own reality after adhomming the author but you are still completely unable to explain how the NATO weapons blockade actually favored the Bosnians. In any case we're done with this discussion you clearly have nothing.
Receipts for what, half of former Yugoslavia ethnically cleansed from Serbs under the NATO umbrella? Don't shift the goalpost from your absurd claim that everything NATO did favoured the Serbs:
The "Republic Srbpska" went from 55% Serbs to 90% Serbs by genociding Bosnians
Nobody denied this genocide, but you apparently deny all the others in Yugoslavia, just as US propaganda want.
It's a hyperbole of course there are some things which favored the Bosnians but likewise you can have Zionists saying NATO is pro-Palestine because NATO did a pro-Palestine thing once.
The process and end result was heavily Serb favored by NATO. The casualty statistics as BE mentions are also just telling by themselves: 83% of Bosnians killed were civilians. But βonlyβ 10% of Serbs killed were civilians. This by itself basically proves that Bosnians did commit massacres on civilians but it wasnβt top-down policy like it was for the Serbs.