this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
261 points (98.5% liked)

Books

8192 readers
85 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
  3. No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If having your perception of a fictional character from a fictional story, challenged with reality, prompts you to seek out and destroy someone's life, you're a problem. It doesn't matter what the reason is, that's your psychological responsibility to manage without hurting other people. If you can't do that, then you need to give up that perception or accept being treated like the threat you are. Others have every right to have different opinions about fictional things without having their life destroyed. That's tyrannical and deeply unhealthy and in this example, that's women and smut.

Perhaps my interjection of a bit of reality into your perception of smut is making you want to commit some social-violence, yourself?

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No one is arguing that such actions are not a problem, I'm arguing that you're usage of fascism is extreme.

Perhaps my interjection of a bit of reality into your perception of smut is making you want to commit some social-violence, yourself?

No, but if you feel that anyone who argues that you're wrong wants to hurt you, you might need to go to therapy. You're literally provoking "social-violence" because someone disagreed with you on the internet.

Perhaps being challenged on a topic you feel strongly about has made you a hypocrite?

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Which i explicitly stated may not be the accurate term, but you seem to have ignored that, in favour of whatever got you riled up. What then would you call it?