this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
754 points (97.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1706 readers
869 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Makes sense, justlike shareholders vote on stuff today

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's oligarchy. Those who own things have power while those who do not have none. Democracy is where every person has equal power. I'd like a system where every employee gets a vote, no matter their status, from the forklift driver to the president of the board of directors. Employees have an incentive for their company to work well long-term because it is their livelyhood.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Shares could still be distributed by tenure rather than position

[–] Libra@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That just sounds like yet another unequal way to divide power, so it's still an oligarchy. Here's a radical idea: why not give everyone who is affected by an entity equal control over it? Why does anyone need more control than everyone else? How could you possibly keep that from being abused to benefit the people in power more than everyone else? This is just capitalism with a little extra shell-game on the side to try to make the inequality seem more just despite being just as unequal.