this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
756 points (96.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1722 readers
626 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago

i mean... trying to calculate an individual's labor output is pointless.

nobody produces anything in a vacuum.

you can't separate the office excel wizards economic output from the janitor's, or the maintenance crew's, or the accountant's, or the sales person's, and so on, and so forth.

labor, especially modern labor, is built entirely upon cooperative, mutually beneficial structures.

the part that isn't working and parasitizes the worker's economic accomplishments, that's really 90% of the issue we have right now.

so the original calculation, which takes the entire profit of the company + CEO income - CEO salary (or the reasonable amount they should be getting) dividend by the number of employees does give you a reasonable baseline of compensation for all employees.

it doesn't make much sense that one "class" of employee would make more than any other, when all of them rely on each other...