this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
848 points (98.5% liked)
World News
1103 readers
735 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
Other communities of interest:
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tell me what trial did bush or subsequent war criminal administration faced to make it an argument that people don't support their actions?
One even got a nobel peace prize, despite war crimes. Got no pushback from the populace.
If you harbor criminals with open records (who knows how many closed records), be ready for some retaliation?
Isnt this what US/Israel claims when they attack civs? But somehow they're never labeled poorly as "war crimes" or "terrorists". hmm… makes you think
But don't be afraid call all the region terrorists, if it makes you sleep better.
Whataboutism, and excusing inexcusable actions because of "retaliation".
I haven't once condoned anything the US military did. Doesn't mean people deserved to die.
It also didn't mean that those who were wronged by the American state should have remained silent and peaceful in front of mass killings perpetrated by all kind of administrations leading the American government. Especially when no legal recourse was given to them.
Were you an Arab who lost his entire family under American bombardments because of the oil stored in your nation soil wouldn't you had wanted some kind of retaliation against that nation? Can you empathize at all?