this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
868 points (99.3% liked)

Work Reform

17078 readers
1546 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is the system working as designed. I'm not sure how anyone missed that.

And while tariffs were in place Amazon was passing on those savings, or lack thereof, to customers. So they mostly didn't see any losses from paying the tariffs. Then they get refunded, and then it's less that the government actually paid Amazon anything, they just gave them a reason to charge people extra in shipping, for no good reason.

Whether those costs were rendered in the shipping cost on Amazon, or by simply marking up the prices so that they could account for those extra costs, doesn't really matter.

Consumers ended up paying this bill. The 650M "refund" was just the government exempting them from costs that the government should not have collected from them in the first place.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And note how prices didn't plummet afterwards. It was a universal price hike on all Americans disguised as regulatory issue.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

They never do.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

This is why I hate """""inflation"""""