this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
52 points (90.6% liked)

Wait That's Interesting

344 readers
52 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Eh not really. Thorium is used

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is thorium not radioactive? Its not radium or plutonium, but it's still radioactive.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Had it wrong, it's yyttrium.Skynet says;

An intact mantle emits low levels of radiation, mainly alpha particles, which are stopped by the mantle itself, air, or even the outer layer of your skin. The greater concern is dust. If a mantle is damaged, burned, or crumbles, inhaling or ingesting thorium-containing dust is more hazardous than simply being near the mantle. Modern mantles are typically thorium-free, using materials such as yttrium instead.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Considering the mantle is 100% going to be burned, I'd say the radioactivity was an issue.

[–] kalpol@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Well, thank goodness for yttrium i guess