this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
44 points (92.3% liked)
Videos
18589 readers
114 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
- AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^
Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Everything good that gets big gets bought and enshitifies. That's nothing new.
As for Youtube channels losing your trust, you should remember who ultimately calls the shots: Google. Their very existence depends on 1/ Google not deplatforming them and 2/ Google paying them if they monetize their channels.
Me, I always assume a channel is compromised the minute they monetize their content. The next level of compromised is when it starts shilling VPNs, energy drinks or razor blades. Getting unsavory investors is just par for the course.
Most of my favorite Youtubers are compromised. I simply enjoy the content and don't trust what they say. And that's pretty easy. For example:
Veritasium does a piece on some math theorem: great! I enjoy the math explanation. Even if they're funded by sketchy private equity groups, it's not going to change the math. But I make a mental never to buy anything from the company they shill for, and if they make a piece that touches on money on elections, I don't watch.
Alec Steel talks about blacksmithing. I listen to what he has to say on diffusion bonding of dissimilar metals, but I skip the shitty underwear and energy drinks he shills. And no investor of his - assuming he gets some one day - will ever change the laws of metallurgy.
Ian Davis and his prosthetic hand project: that's more dicey. The fundamentals of what he's building don't change, the technical explanations are sound, but he's sold to 3D printer makers, so he keeps plugging 3D printers as the good solution to make parts for his prosthetics. If I didn't know anything about 3D printing, I might easily think they're the best printers around, because the guy seems to genuine. But I do, so I dismiss anything he says about 3D printers and assume other brands would be equally suitable. And of course, his project is non-profit, so it's not like hypothetical investors would have much sway over what he says or does.
...
In other words, what I'm saying is: like TV, news and all the rest, enjoy your Youtubers by applying a thick layer of critical thinking to what they say. They're all tainted.
Veritasium got on my shit list when he started beef with electroboom, was fucking dead ass wrong, and then acted like a smug ass about it. It was about that time he started in with the clickbait "you are wrong about XYZ" videos.
Alec Steele... I don't mind the underwear commercials for reasons. He knows what he's doing. I don't mind it when the sponsor ads come with some effort instead of just "hey, now I'm going to lie to you about VPNs for two minutes."
If you want the ultimate in putting effort into shilling for your sponsor, check out Map Men: they actually take the time to put together a full-blown skit for each for their sponsored segments.
Here for example:
https://youtu.be/6zq5XtyV3yg?t=222
It's honestly the only Youtube channel I will disable SponsorBlock for, and watch the sponsored segments of, just for the entertainment values. All the other Youtubers can fuck right off.
Do you fuck with Internet Comment Etiquette? Being a comedy channel he doesn't really have much stake politically but all his political takes he either keeps subliminal or uses to take jabs at whichever establishment currently holds cultural dominance.
I ask because when I consider somebody's the depth to which someone is compromising I'm trying to look at who benefits from buying good favor on a channel. And in a case like that where he's taking money from pretty much all the brands and industries you mention, he doesn't ever use that to speak well of any particular interest or positively boost anyone.
That and he also does intricate 2-5 minute ads that border on Dadaist art and purposefully push the content boundaries on youtube. So like there's clear money being there but it could serve to show that just because somebody is paid for doesn't mean they're not putting their art above the sponsor