Programmer Humor

33253 readers

1003 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
- If the mod doesn't find it funny, you're banned. Ha-ha!... For real: do not use the community for "statements". There are other places for such content. Keep it chill and funny.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

anzo@programming.dev

Feyter@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

883

reason enough to fail the interview (europe.pub)

submitted 2 weeks ago by groctel@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

155 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All of which the physicist can trivially account for, control and variable test around, should the requested question be updated to require it.

The requested question did not include "In all possible scenarios", thus determining the volume of the sphere via physics calculation at the most average of conditions, is the most correct valid solution, absent further requirement parameters.

[–] untorquer@quokk.au 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You're right in terms of grading a student's homework or whatever.

In research/publication/career these assumptions must be stated unless given.

But I was responding to:

The physicist’s answer would be correct anywhere, no matter the temperature or density of the fluid.

Which includes non-standard conditions.

[–] Aqivex@fedinsfw.app 2 points 2 weeks ago

But I was responding to: The physicist’s answer would be correct anywhere, no matter the temperature or density of the fluid. Which includes non-standard conditions.