this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
7 points (81.8% liked)

Global News

6303 readers
222 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/48522864

Chinese companies are present in more than one-third of all African port developments. As noted by the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, these companies in some cases dominate the entire port development process from finance to construction and operations. Sometimes, they share ownership.

Port development is part of Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Beijing has either financed, built, has a stake in or controls operations of about 78 trade ports in Africa.

“African ports matter to China for one simple reason. They sit at the choke points of trade,” Irina Tsukerman, president of Scarab Rising Inc. and fellow at the Arabian Peninsula Institute, told Kenya’s The EastAfrican newspaper. “Most African exports and imports still move by sea, and the fastest way to shape that flow is to shape the ports where cargo is cleared, stored, priced, and routed onward.”

Analysts say Chinese involvement in African ports raises concerns about military use, because Beijing-backed ports are suitable for both commercial and military applications.

“At least seven Chinese-backed ports in Africa have design features that make them capable of berthing Chinese naval facilities although they may not have been created specifically for this purpose,” Paul Nantulya, research associate at the Africa Center, told Engineering News-Record magazine.

...

For example, he said, the Angolan port of Luwanda can host any major Chinese surface combat vessel, the Namibian port of Walvis Bay can house up to eight Chinese guided missile destroyers and the port of Victoria in Seychelles can also host up to two Chinese corvettes, which are modern littoral combat-oriented warships.

...

China’s 2019 defense white paper said naval officials were developing “overseas logistical facilities to address deficiencies in overseas operations” and called for a shift from “near coast active defense to far seas maneuvering operations.”

There is precedence for China developing an African port purportedly for commercial purposes, then using it militarily. When Djibouti’s Chinese-developed Doraleh Port opened in May 2017, Djiboutian President Ismail Omar Guelleh and Chinese representatives took turns commending one another on the achievement. From Doraleh, the Chinese Navy can overlook the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait through which an estimated 12.5% to 20% of global trade passes annually.

Two months later, the Djiboutians and Chinese dignitaries met again to celebrate the completion of China’s first overseas military base, a few minutes’ drive from the port. The facility was built for Beijing’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, which reportedly has exclusive use of at least one of the port’s berths.

...

Nantulya told Engineering News-Record he identified more than 10 occasions when Chinese military ships have docked in seven different African ports in recent years, including those at Doraleh; Lagos, Nigeria; Durban, South Africa; and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

“My assessment is that China will definitely build a new military base in Africa,” Nantulya said. “But it is difficult to guess which port will be selected for this purpose.”

...

Web archive link

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 1 points 10 minutes ago

As an addition: There are many excellent studies illustrating how China leverages its foreign investments across the globe exclusively to its own benefit at the cost of regional economies and their peoples.

As one study from 2023, China as an International Lender of Last Resort (pdf), states,

China’s rescue loans differ from those of established international lenders of last resort in that they (i) are opaque, (ii) carry relatively high interest rates, and (iii) are almost exclusively targeted to debtors of China's Belt and Road Initiative ... Chinese rescue lending is extended at relatively high interest rates. The [U.S.] Fed usually charges margins of around 25 basis points over the LIBOR reference rate. In contrast, the PBOC swap lines show interest rates at margins between 200 and 400 basis points above the Shibor reference rate, while the typical rescue loan by Chinese banks requires interest rates of 5 percent ... These rates are also considerably higher than the average IMF interest rate, which has been around 2 percent for non-concessional lending operations over the past 10 years ...

In a more recent investigation, researchers showed how China uses collateralizes (pdf) to achieve its goals that. As the study says, Beijing's practices,

raise new concerns about debt transparency, fiscal management, fiscal autonomy, and the quality of macroeconomic surveillance, particularly in commodity-exporting EMDEs [emerging market and developing economies] ... lending to EMDEs by Chinese creditors documents a heavy reliance on collateral unrelated to the stated purpose of the debt: loans secured by commodity revenues are not designed to generate more of these revenue ... l lenders can manage subordination risk with so-called “negative pledge” clauses in their contracts, which usually require the debtor to forswear secured borrowing ... Chinese lenders’ apparent preference for quasi-collateral means that their security interests are rarely recorded in public registries or collateral filing systems ... These factors, combined with confidentiality clauses preventing disclosure, raise asymmetric information problems among creditors ...

Both studies complement a strong body of research regarding China's malign lending practice which show similar patterns across all countries, including, of course, Africa.

[–] username_1@programming.dev -1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, who feeds Africa, those build military bases there. Until middle of XXth century it was Europe, later the USA, now China. The place is too interesting to stay empty.

[–] Sepia@mander.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, who feeds Africa ...

I stopped reading after this extraordinarily peculiar statement.

[–] username_1@programming.dev -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You may not like it, but it is a reality. Why else is there so much talks about decreasing help from the US and UK? Because Africa needs that help.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Western countries are the reason Africa has been over exploited for multiple centuries

[–] username_1@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Now it's China's turn, apparently.

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

If you think Chinese investment into African countries is anything like the colonialism and neocolonialism of Western nations, you have no idea what you're talking about

Demystifying Chinese Overseas Lending and Development Finance. - BU

The Chinese Debt Trap Is a Myth: The Narrative Wrongfully Portrays Both Beijing and the Developing Countries It Deals With. - HBU

Meanwhile, every accusation is a confession

Both the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank have been accused of predatory lending practices to keep emerging economies in debt, including: demanding structural adjustment programmes as a condition for loans, often to governments who see these loans as a last resort,[63][64][65] pressuring for privatization and exerting undue influence over central banks.[66][67][68][69] The founder of the activist network Committee for the Abolition of Illegitimate Debt wrote: "The World Bank and the IMF have systematically made loans to states as a means of influencing their policies."[70] [better source needed] The IMF has used geopolitical considerations, rather than exclusively economic conditions, to decide which countries received loans.[71]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt-trap_diplomacy

[–] username_1@programming.dev 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Why are you even telling all that? Nobody said that it is good for Africans.
I just said that Europe and US walked away, leaving Africa to China. And China will use Africa the same way as it was previously used by Europe or US.
Or are you just a bot, copy-pasting the same pre-made texts in every thread where Africa and China or Europe/US are mentioned?

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

China will use Africa the same way as it was previously used by Europe or US.

I literally just gave 2 articles and a wiki that show the complete opposite.

Chinese investment has already been magnitudes better than African nations than Western neo/colonialism has been. Equating the two is insane