this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
810 points (99.4% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26093 readers
85 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 135 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

Is there a difference in tone or meaning between accidentally and inadvertently? I feel like accidentally means they did something that was a bad thing.

[–] Contentedness@lemmy.nz 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree it seems a strange choice of words.

Japanese monks and emperors kept meticulous records of cherry blossom festivals for 1,200 years. ~~They accidentally~~ In doing so they built the world's longest climate dataset

Something like that seems more straightforward.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I think “inadvertently” fits in that it isn’t what they were intending to do.

“Accidentally” feels sorta judgy.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah. “It was an accident” sounds like pleading, excusing. “I inadvertently…” sounds like an explanation of the facts. imo

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] xploit@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Mr Bob Ross would like a word...
I agree with you on inadvertently, but accident, if I'm not mistaken would generally considered something where you do not inherently attribute blame. At least thats what I recall being justification for making the change in UK in calling traffic 'incidents' incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

UK in calling traffic ‘incidents’ incidents instead of accidents several years back. Dunno if it stuck though.

Wait is that real? I thought it was just a joke when it was said in Hot Fuzz

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They accidentally became climate change wackos supporting a communist agenda to make everyone gay and push taxes supporting public transportation.

[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm not necessarily, accidentally has no negative implication unlike accident usually has. In this particular case the meaning of accidentally is synonym with unexpectedly or by chance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Accidents don’t have to be bad? Accident means just “not on purpose” it has no connotation either way

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aww, shit. Now there's record all over the floor... I'll go get the data bin...

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You got the statistimop there as well? (I'm reaching...)

Love the user name, by the way. 👌

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

Thanks! You can have it!

Edit: I like eating poops. Yum yum.

2nd Edit: @victorz@lemmy.world why would you write something that like???

[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Was going to say this myself and then saw your comment. Totally agree. 'Accidently' practically implies that the record keeping itself only happened because some pencils happened to fall on paper. They did exactly what they intended to and used it for their own purpose. It just turned out to have a different purpose, too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Incidentally would be more accurate perhaps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Kill them all. Steal their data." - MAGA

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Is that dataset up anywhere as a CSV?

I'd really love to build a lesson around it!

[–] zout@fedia.io 24 points 1 week ago
[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago

Well, glaciers keep the longest climate datasets, it's just in a format that takes some work to translate.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago (11 children)

citation for claim that it's the longest-dated climate dataset?

[–] Sylence@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not the longest climate dataset, but it may be the longest directly recorded by humans. All of these types of data are climate proxies (alternate indicators we can use to gain information about historic climates), the longest of which are ice core measurements.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Idk, egyptian priests kept records of the groundwater levels to predict the nile flood times to keep the peasants in check, and that could count as a climate dataset that far predates and is longer than this.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do floods correlate well with the climate there, or are they affected by something else, too? If they are not much affected, then that could be a dataset indeed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So temperatures are going down soon, right? RIGHT?

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know, it's the weather. Temperature goes up. Temperature goes down. EZPZ

[–] deliciEsteva@piefed.world 7 points 1 week ago

Just what I needed to hear. I would have rejected any other answer anyway. So I can happily go back to sleep now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›