this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
91 points (97.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

41793 readers
566 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If I see a gap between two lines of text, and that gap vanishes when I commit the document to the web or save it to a file, then it's not 'WYSIWYG'. But this has been my experience with 100% of such editors.

I propose a new acronym to replace 'wizzy-wig':

WYSMBWYGIYLBIACWBFRTWNBMCTYSSIYUC

What You See Might Be What You Get if You're Lucky but it Almost Certainly Won't Be For Reasons That Will Never Be Made Clear to You So Suck it Ya Ugly Cunt

Not as pithy, but at least it's accurate.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

WYSIMOLWIG was coined decades ago.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Do they even make them anymore? Last one I used which claimed to be WYSIWYG was Wordsworth on Amiga in the '90s.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Personally I feel like they're generally pretty good at WYSIWYG. What they're bad at is WYSIWYW (What You See Is What You Want).

After I do a bunch of work in Word and I have a bunch of garbage, when I load that file back I still have the same garbage. If I print it, I get the same garbage. So yeah, I get what I see.

Is that what I want? No, I want not-garbage.

Anyone remember WordPerfect coming out with "reveal codes" and allowing you to basically edit the markup and fix the issues?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't believe Word ever claimed to be WYSIWYG.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

It certainly has been marketed as one, but regardless, it is one. The commenter you've replied to isn't saying otherwise, they're saying it's difficult to achieve the desired outcome.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

After a while I realized that Word (the web app) does not render lines of text in the same position as Word (the desktop app), in the very same file. The former seems to use a pseudo random line spacing.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

PDF is the only format I know of that is truly WYSIWYG, as it's intended for print output. But, even with that, you need to know what you're doing, it's possible to fuck it up.

[–] Paulemeister@feddit.org 5 points 3 hours ago

Unless the fonts are not embedded and you don't have the right fonts installed

[–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 hours ago

I've just realised I haven't used anything like that in 20 years. Macromedia Dreamweaver, those were the days!

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

It sounds like you are only talking about html.

Delphi VB6 C# Winforms Qt

These wysiwyg editors usually worked/work without issues.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Gimme that WYSIWYM, LyX.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

Try VisualEditor on e.g. Wikipedia. You notice idiosynchrasies if you're doing something specific or are pretty experienced, but overall, the difference between the editor and the preview (fully rendered page) is trivial unless you're messing around with a few specific elements (even then, a quick 'Preview' fills in this gap).

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Shame you never had the misfortune of having to use NetObjects Fusion. Tables nested like an oversized fractal matryoshka doll.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 2 points 7 hours ago

there was a good HTML editor back in the day called homesite, I made a very popular counterstrike site with it

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 8 hours ago

As shitty as Google is, I've been messing about with Google Sites for one project, and I've been quite impressed with its WYSIWYG accuracy.

Your options there are limited (which probably plays into how it's so good), but what it shows you as you build it is pretty much exactly how the website will look when you publish it.

I'm fond of WYSISWYG (what you see is sorta what you get).

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 3 points 9 hours ago

I've made a few apps with wxFormbuilder and they were wysiwyg.

[–] Lehmuusa@nord.pub 1 points 8 hours ago