It is the most obvious one: https://about.instagram.com/brand/type
don't feel bad, sometimes there are just too many trees to see the forest
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
14 points (93.8% liked)
Typography & fonts
589 readers
14 users here now
A community to discuss and share information about typography and fonts
Sibling community:
Rules of conduct:
The usual ones on Lemmy and Mastodon. In short: be kind or at least respectful, no offensive language, no harassment, no spam.
(Icon: detail from the title of Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style. Banner: details from pages 6 and 12, ibid.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ok so! I've actually been to that page, and was thinking I had found it, however, look at the Q and the I:
The Q in the table has a piggy-tail absent in the original, and the I has serifs, that's what threw me off. But looking at the table longer, everything else does seem to match...
Weird, but anyway, I think we can conisder this solved, thanks!
wha... I thought it'd be that simple, but no.
Apparently they have multiple revisions of that typeface. Interestingly, all variants on the page except their condensed variant has the quirky Q. Even the condensed bold has it, but not the condensed regular.
