this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
203 points (96.8% liked)

News

38049 readers
1444 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Site takes no action over hate posts against UK politicians including Kemi Badenoch, Shabana Mahmood and Zia Yusuf

X has refused to take down dozens of social media posts reported as “hate, abuse or harassment” in which prominent UK politicians, including Kemi Badenoch, have been racially abused.

In May, researchers from the social inclusion thinktank British Future reported 30 posts from this year in which the Conservative party leader was called the N-word. In each case the researchers used the platform’s “hate, abuse or harassment” reporting option. X refused to act in the majority of cases, despite repeated requests.

The Guardian understands X routinely takes action only when posts are reported to it as illegal under the UK’s Online Safety Act. In those cases, it restricts visibility in the UK, leaving the post unrestricted in other jurisdictions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 54 points 6 days ago (10 children)

I have no idea what the "P-word" would be.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago

Paki, usually yelled at people's faces like "Get out of my country you fucking Paki scum" before trashing someone's corner shop. Definitely a racist slur due to how the British losers use it. Despite appearing like shorthand it's become a slur.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 16 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Wikipedia says it's a derogatory term used for Pakistani people.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’d generalize it to South Asian brown people in general as racists aren’t exactly geography experts

[–] Bixcut@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like something a p-word would say

load more comments (2 replies)

Reform UK’s Zia Yusuf was told in one tweet, which used the P-word, to “sod off” to Pakistan.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago

Pussy? P-eter? P-o-ta-to? P-ot-a-soup? P-at-a-ba-da...ding-dong? I have literally no idea. People are saying it's a slur and I'm glad I don't know. If you respond to this with what it is, I'm blocking you, I really don't want to know or propagate more slurs and racism in this world. Eradicate all Nazi scum.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago (5 children)

This is why it's stupid to use "n-word" and, in this case "p-word", in a news article reporting what was said. The words, in the context of quoting another, should be spelled out, to present the full impact of the slur. The words are not offensive, they're just words, it's the context that gives them weight and meaning. I don't know what the "p-word" is, and I've learned nothing from this article about it. I can't avoid using a slur, or even recognizing a word as a slur, if I don't know what it is.

I've learned, however, in social media sites, I can't spell out the word, lest I be auto-banned from entire communities simply for stringing together those letters in that order, regardless of context. Bots don't understand context, they just swing the ban hammer if they see the word.

Those who use slurs in hateful ways should NOT be given the consideration of sanitizing a word they said, in news reports quoting them. They should be quoted in full.

[–] ElderReflections@fedia.io 27 points 6 days ago

I've never had an issue with reading the n-word, listening to NWA or watching Django Unchained. I do take issue with being told I "should go back to Jamaica", but that doesn't need sanitizing

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And on the flip side, you could use only fancy words and yet, still attack and hate people.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

You... pernicious nostril!

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah it's giving off You-know-who vibes from Harry Potter.

[–] Arcanepotato@crazypeople.online 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not spelling out the word isn't about protecting the people who used it, it's about sparing the people targeted by the slur from having to read it.

Referring to a word vs using it is the context.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (5 children)

If you don't discuss these things openly you're helping hide them. I assure you people from Pakistan know the word, and aren't fragile. Better to openly discuss racism if you want a culture to deal with it, rather than preserve it.

Once the slur is discussed people can discuss how things got this way, rather than sneaking around on egg shells using hushed tones.

[–] ati@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not targeted at people from Pakistan particularly, it's applied to anyone of vaguely South Asian appearance.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

I'm pretty sure it is the shortened slur for Pakistanis that gets used for any person who looks vaguely like they might be from that region, including Indians (who mostly don't enjoy being confused with their regional neighbors/hated enemies).

[–] Hiatus@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sorta like how reddit protects pedos and abusers. Fucking disgusting sites.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The Epstein Class has class solidarity.

Edit: They will do everything they can protect each other. Twitter allows racist shit to keep working class people fighting. Reddit protects the child abusers of the Epstein Class.

[–] Hiatus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I agree completely. Anything to divide the poors and make them hate eachother. Its so fucking easy too. Easy to get pissed when youve worked your ass off and the fruits get fucked with. Easy to be happy and work together when youre so rich the fruits dont matter.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Wait, the site owned by a sieg-heiling Nazi allows racist posts?

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I know what they're referring to by N-word, but wtf is the P-word? I skimmed the article and still couldn't figure it out.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Phaggot? Pee Pee Poo Poo? Pheasant?

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

pee pee poo poo

I'm suddenly back in kindergarten and smirking

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

Oh shit! They're talking about plenury indulgences!

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s Paki, a racial slur for South Asian people common in the UK.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Thank you. I've seen this used before but never referred to in the same connotations as the N-word. Is it common for it to be treated as harshly as the former over there? I'm not aware of it being as severe in the US, but we don't have the same proportions.

[–] ati@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

Not quite as severe, but same ballpark.

[–] dreksob@feddit.online 14 points 6 days ago

To be fair, if they banned the bots and the Nazis, they wouldn't have any traffic at all.

[–] leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The 'p' word is a shortening of the word 'Pakistani' to the first four letters and is very much used abusively. When people came to the UK from Asia - India, Bangladesh and Pakistan mostly - starting in the 1950/60's, the usual assortment of racist/fascist scum, being both hateful cunts and also deeply stupid, assumed anyone who looked Asian was Pakistani and so the p-word became a term of racial abuse for literally anyone who might appear to be from that part of Asia or have that heritage.

[–] laranis@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

First thought was p-word could be "pajeet", but comments below say it is likely "paki". Can someone from UK clarify?

[–] mufkin@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I was thinking peckerwood. It’s in line with the n word.

[–] loaf@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

To be fair, if they banned all the bots, they’d have no traffic at all.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

The form "X-slur" is much better than "X-word".

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's only acceptable to shorten names of wealthy, white nationalities like Brits, Aussies and Swedes.

Pakistan and Nigeria don't want an invitation to this club.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›